Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
PTC Logo
3,948 views|3,057 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Siemens Logo
5,311 views|3,503 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Codebeamer and Polarion ALM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Codebeamer vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability.""CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing.""Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.""There is a lot of complexity involved, meaning it can do many things, which can be quite useful.""Codebeamer's API-based integration and many other integration aspects with other solutions are very powerful.""The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China.""You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily.""It is a stable solution."

More Codebeamer Pros →

"Scalability is good...The integration is quite good.""Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature.""The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it.""The technical support is quite good.""The most valuable feature is the function of the ALM system.""The features I find the most valuable are requirement tracking and schematics.""We had a nice experience with technical support.""I am impressed with the solution’s stability."

More Polarion ALM Pros →

Cons
"It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now.""The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required.""I would like to see more, easily trackable reports.""During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.""We would like to see more industry-specific features that are tailored to the vertical markets.""Usability needs to be improved.""The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup.""Certain areas in Codebeamer could be improved, like addressing small issues, glitches, or bugs."

More Codebeamer Cons →

"Based on my understanding, the tool's integration capabilities with multiple tools is an area of concern that Polarion needs to focus on more.""We use PTC Windchill, and Polarion ALM doesn't have native integration, so we had to purchase the connector to integrate it with Polarion ALM. We still haven't implemented it.""The tool needs to improve its planning. It also needs to add more integrations.""The solution's editing capabilities need improvement.""As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming.""Test management lacks an automated process.""The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based.""The ease-of-use could be improved a little."

More Polarion ALM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions."
  • "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."
  • "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
  • "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
  • More Codebeamer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."
  • "If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."
  • "Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "Software for medical devices is always expensive."
  • "You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."
  • "It is an expensive product."
  • More Polarion ALM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
    Top Answer:As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
    Top Answer:During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks.
    Top Answer:At the moment, I haven't looked in-depth into what needs improvement in the product. Based on my understanding, the tool's integration capabilities with multiple tools is an area of concern that… more »
    Top Answer:I work in an industry where I mainly look after the requirements, for which I use Polarion ALM.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,948
    Comparisons
    3,057
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    5,311
    Comparisons
    3,503
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    PTC Integrity logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Jira logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    IBM Rational ALM logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Jama Connect logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Jira logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    PTC Integrity logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Jama Connect logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    codeBeamer ALM
    Learn More
    Overview

    codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

    The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

    Sample Customers
    Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
    Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Transportation Company7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company31%
    Healthcare Company23%
    Transportation Company15%
    Consumer Goods Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Codebeamer vs. Polarion ALM
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Codebeamer is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 10 reviews while Polarion ALM is ranked 7th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 17 reviews. Codebeamer is rated 7.8, while Polarion ALM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Codebeamer writes "Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion ALM writes "Though needing an improvement in reporting and time for extraction of the data, its integration capabilities are good". Codebeamer is most compared with PTC Integrity, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, IBM Rational ALM and Jama Connect, whereas Polarion ALM is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, PTC Integrity, GitLab and Jama Connect. See our Codebeamer vs. Polarion ALM report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.