We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We're now able to store large volumes of data through Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop. We're able to push large volumes of data to the platform, and that used to be a challenge, especially when storing a terabyte of information. This is the area where Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop improved the organization."
"The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."
"The search function is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The solution is stable."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there are a lot of things that need to improve. I believe they are working on that."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"The product as a whole is good."
"In terms of scalability, if you have enough hardware you can scale out. Scalability doesn't have any issues."
"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."
"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"The dashboard could be improved."
"Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment."
"The price of this solution could be lowered."
"The areas of improvement depend on the scale of the project. For banking customers, security features and an essential budget for commercial licenses would be the top priority. Data regulation could be the most crucial for a project with extensive data or an extra use case."
"There is a maximum of a one-gigabyte block size, which is an area of storage that can be improved upon."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"The solution does not support multiple languages very well and this means users need to create work-arounds to implement some solutions."
"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."
"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and SingleStore, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Oracle NoSQL. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. ScyllaDB report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.