We performed a comparison between Citrix Secure Workspace Access and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA."Virtual desktops and virtual apps are most valuable."
"It is easy and simple, and it has got an easy interface. It is not hard to learn. With just three clicks, you log in, and you're there."
"Google Cloud Platform has the best feature for real-time collaboration."
"UI representation is the aspect I like the most about GCP, even more than Azure or AWS."
"There is a lot of flexibility and a lot of control if you use this efficiently."
"The solution has many features for stability and security."
"The product is simple to use."
"The solution is very easy to use. It's easy to navigate and to work with."
"It is totally awesome in terms of scalability. Its scalability was the main reason for moving to Google Cloud. It also comes with a lot of features. We are satisfied with the features it has."
"If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"When we go to print, we have to go through secure print. The secure printing kind of takes a while. It is a little latent."
"INGPU for engineering software is an area of improvement."
"The support can be more efficient. Google has different layers of support, like layer one, layer two, and layer three, but normally, the response from layer one is not very useful."
"As an individual developer, I would like Google Cloud IAP to offer more flexibility, especially for smaller-scale usage."
"I think that the solution needs to be made available in a local region of every country, especially in countries like Taiwan."
"The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use."
"The product’s user interface must be more user-friendly and detailed."
"The platform’s stability and scalability need improvement."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
More Citrix Secure Workspace Access Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix Secure Workspace Access is ranked 10th in ZTNA with 2 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 41 reviews. Citrix Secure Workspace Access is rated 8.6, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Citrix Secure Workspace Access writes "Makes it convenient to work from home, supports everything I need, and is easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". Citrix Secure Workspace Access is most compared with Appgate SDP, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Perimeter 81, whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco Duo and Cato SASE Cloud Platform.
See our list of best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
