We performed a comparison between Citrix Analytics for Security and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Cynet and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA."This console gives you the entire view, which makes life easier and allows you to take precautionary measures."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its artificial intelligence component, Watson. Its contribution is pretty good from a machine-learning artificial intelligence perspective. This compliments the orchestration automation component, as well."
"The correlation and the parsing are important features, since it is very important for a SIEM to have a good scalability and performance."
"The threat protection network is the most valuable feature, because when you get an offense, you can actually trace it back to where it originated from, how it originated, and why."
"On the back-end, Watson helps me figure out an exact problem, sometimes giving me the result."
"Improves visibility and has a great new dashboard."
"It's quite scalable. We have upgraded some solutions from 1000 APS up to 3500 APS to 5000 APS. It's a good solution, they have no scalability issues."
"I think it's a very stable product that provides much more visibility than the other product."
"Lacks recording features."
"The remote access features need improvement."
"The released patch quality is poor. IBM should test those patches on their side, not on the client's side."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
"The solution is difficult to understand in the beginning and has complex management configurations that can be improved."
"The architecture could be improved. I got stuck for a long time trying to understand the architecture, as it is quite challenging."
"QRadar needs to be improved on the storage side, particularly when the disc exceeded the maximum threshold."
"This solution is on-premise and many customers are moving to the cloud base solution."
"IMB should reduce the pricing, or reduce some of the features for a more economical solution for the customer."
"IBM needs to invest more into the collaboration with other vendors."
More Citrix Analytics for Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is a security and analytics platform designed to defend against threats and scale security operations.
Citrix Analytics for Security is ranked 18th in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 2 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 197 reviews. Citrix Analytics for Security is rated 8.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Citrix Analytics for Security writes "Helped the organization to provide high-security access to applications and performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Citrix Analytics for Security is most compared with , whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.