We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"I am getting much better performance than relational databases."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."
"The solution is limited to a linear performance."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"Cassandra could be more user-friendly like MongoDB."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, InfluxDB, MongoDB, ScyllaDB and DataStax, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Accumulo, SingleStore, ScyllaDB and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
