We performed a comparison between SECDO Platform and VMware Carbon Black Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."This is stable and scalable."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."
"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."
"It basically automates the entire alert investigation process."
"The market information they gather from the community is really good. Their configuration capabilities are good."
"The most valuable features are its lightweight design, ensuring minimal impact on end-users, and its real-time protection."
"It is nice when you're in a situation where you think someone's device is compromised and that there's some malware getting into your fleet."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to seek out abnormal activity and to create alerts."
"Integration and scalability are the most valuable."
"VMware Carbon Black Cloud is a user-friendly solution that can isolate machines from the rest of the network."
"The most valuable features are the threat-hunting and the batch console."
"Setting up and managing the setup for this solution is okay. It is stable, scalable, and it runs just fine. No issues with technical support."
"The solution is not stable."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."
"Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."
"Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it."
"Additionally, it is complex to use, and the pricing should be improved."
"Technical support for the solution should be improved because there is a scarcity of support teams in the Middle East."
"They have different products, but if we wanted to take their protection and their EPR, then we would need to have two agents"
"One area for improvement is the maturity of its vulnerability features."
"The solution needs to simplify the process of adding custom watchlists, as well as embrace YARA for rule creation."
"There have been some performance issues when deploying on Windows Server, but I believe Carbon Black is working on that."
"We are subscribed to FS-ISAC threat indicator, but have been unsuccessful in adding it to our alliance feeds."
"They need to improve the batch console. It needs more capabilities. We are limited by the ones it provides..."
Earn 20 points
SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 18 reviews. SECDO Platform is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Cloud writes " Shows promise for endpoint detection and response, with room for improvement in complexity and pricing ". SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas VMware Carbon Black Cloud is most compared with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, Fidelis Elevate, Splunk SOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.