We performed a comparison between Camunda and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"The flexibility is great."
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM. See our Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
