We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 66 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Bizagi, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Appian and Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.