We performed a comparison between Camunda and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It has an open BPM"
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"The flexibility is great."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 66 reviews while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 26th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Bizagi, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Ivanti Automation, ServiceNow Orchestration, OpenText Operations Orchestration, vCenter Orchestrator and BizTalk Server.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.