Camunda vs Genpact Cora SeQuence comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Logo
33,229 views|20,177 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Genpact Logo
614 views|343 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Camunda and Genpact Cora SeQuence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Overall, the solution has been very solid.""The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner.""Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment.""I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable.""The most valuable feature is the scheduling.""The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process.""One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."

More Camunda Pros →

"It is very stable. There is no downtime.""The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Pros →

Cons
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive.""They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome.""The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved.""Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it.""I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist.""I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.""I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."

More Camunda Cons →

"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly.""The setup and configuration is complex."

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    33,229
    Comparisons
    20,177
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    911
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    614
    Comparisons
    343
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle. The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.
    Sample Customers
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    Wholesaler/Distributor8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Camunda vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility. See our Camunda vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.