File Master Plus vs IBM Application Performance Analyzer for zOS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
7th
Views
256
Comparisons
159
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
Views
302
Comparisons
195
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA File Master Plus
IBM Application Performance Analyzer for z/OS, IBM APA
Learn More
Overview

CA File Master Plus is designed to streamline data assets and procedures, improve the accuracy of your mainframe data, reduce the time and effort associated with test file editing and data creation as well as reduce training costs.

This Application and Testing Tools solution is a file management and data manipulation tool architected to speed test file creation and editing for virtual storage access method (VSAM), sequential and partitioned datasets. With the ability to visually browse and edit data, you can respond quickly to problems that may arise and make accurate changes on the fly.

It also enables you to issue commands in batch, handily compare multiple file versions and filter your datasets with precision. To save your IT organization time and money, CA File Master Plus helps your team:

  • Create more consistent and accurate test data.
  • Find and fix problems more quickly.

IBM Application Performance Analyzer for z/OS measures and reports how applications use available resources. This easy to use tool helps you identify system constraints and improve application performance.

Application Performance Analyzer for z/OS:

  • Helps you maximize the performance of your existing applications and improve response time of online transactions and batch turnaround times.
  • Gives you the information needed to isolate performance problems in applications and test the effect of increased workloads on your systems.
  • Monitors, analyzes and reports the performance of CICS, Assembler, COBOL, PL/I, C/C++, DB2, IMS WebSphere MQ and WebSphere Application Server applications.
  • Collects samples from the monitored address space and analyzes the system or resource application usage of CPU, DASD, I/O or the total address space.
  • Features online analysis reports that can be created as PDF or XML files, so that you can view them on workstations or transfer them easily to other applications.
Sample Customers
Blue Hill Data Services
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm27%
Insurance Company17%
Computer Software Company9%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm35%
Computer Software Company9%
Insurance Company9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise85%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise83%

File Master Plus is ranked 7th in Mainframe Testing Tools while IBM Application Performance Analyzer for zOS is ranked 5th in Mainframe Testing Tools. File Master Plus is rated 8.6, while IBM Application Performance Analyzer for zOS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of File Master Plus writes "Enables us to quickly investigate, fix problems related to our application data". On the other hand, File Master Plus is most compared with IBM File Manager, BMC Compuware File-AID, BMC Compuware Topaz Program Analysis and BMC Compuware Topaz Enterprise Data, whereas IBM Application Performance Analyzer for zOS is most compared with BMC Compuware Strobe, BMC Compuware Hiperstation and Mainframe Application Tuner.

See our list of best Mainframe Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.