We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)."How simple it is to create new solutions."
"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"EDI is robust and integration with SAP is good."
"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"Scalability and connectors to different cloud applications is lacking."
"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 60 reviews while webMethods.io is ranked 18th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 2 reviews. webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io writes "Comes with strong and powerful BPM ". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with webMethods.io Integration, IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus, whereas webMethods.io is most compared with .
We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.