We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity and LiquidPlanner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."Transparency and just having the ability to procure information that is pertinent."
"It makes the whole lifecycle of project management a lot easier than using the legacy systems, which we are retiring every few months because of PPM."
"The app style of the new UI is absolutely fantastic. It's the right way to go. Our users will love it."
"Broadcom Clarity PPM's most valuable feature is the plenty of modules, such as portfolio, project, resource, and time."
"It has highlighted areas in our company that were deficient in resources. It has allowed us to hire, then realize more benefits regarding the number of projects we can get done."
"I appreciate the report that shows how utilized a person is set to be within the coming months. I use that feature a good bit."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the XFlow, that interface is pretty cool."
"It is allowing us to keep track of what our projects are doing, and the idea module, what projects are coming into the pipeline."
"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."
"Could be using more updated technologies."
"We see it as overhead. Let us collect all the data in one place. Which, it is always nice to have everything in one place, but it does cause that overhead."
"It should be integrated with CA Service Desk Manager so that, when you have time for a ticket or when someone gets assigned a ticket, in PPM it automatically shows that they have to account for that: that they would both enter time in the past and, also, that this is going to take them time in the future."
"Broadcom Clarity PPM should improve how the reports are being generated and contracts management."
"Look and feel of the user experience."
"The risks issues and changes are not in the new UX yet."
"Clarity PPM would be improved by developing better support for the Agile framework."
"It would be good for them to work on the user interface to make it more interactive."
"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Clarity is ranked 6th in Project Management Software with 136 reviews while LiquidPlanner is ranked 34th in Project Management Software. Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0, while LiquidPlanner is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LiquidPlanner writes "Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management". Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, Planview Portfolios, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and Smartsheet, whereas LiquidPlanner is most compared with .
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.