We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"Documentation could be improved."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"It is difficult to maintain."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 12th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.