We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The tool improved our data integration workflow primarily due to its compatibility with Oracle. Its integration makes it very convenient for analytics. Its most valuable feature is robust extended capability. The solution's debugging capabilities are good."
"ODI significantly improves data integration and management by allowing customization of data types from various sources like SQL Server databases."
"ODI is a very accessible tool, especially since the mapping functionality has been added."
"The product has an ELT approach."
"Oracle provides great documentation."
"All our systems can be widely integrated by ODI, such as transactional systems, our data warehouses, and B2B integration."
"It can integrate with more recent databases like Cassandra, Hadoop, and other more recent Big Data databases."
"Most of the functions are very straightforward, like the data model, mapping, package, and load plan. Thus, a new user could get started very fast."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Documentation could be improved."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"The stability of the software could be improved. Sometimes, the software just crashes. "
"The tool should improve its pricing. It prevents the application of Oracle ODI on small and medium projects in countries like Croatia, Germany, or the US. While there are no technological obstacles to using it, the high price makes it unfeasible for projects with smaller budgets."
"Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is already good as a solution. Still, it needs some editing of its preview package, or if the package is upgraded, that will make Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) even better."
"I rate it a seven out of 10 because there is room for growth because ODI is still new, in comparison to Informatica, which is a mature product."
"ODI could improve by focusing on streamlining its features without unnecessary overhead."
"The performance of the user interface is in need of improvement."
"The interface of ODI could be improved. For example, navigating and finding functions can be difficult. For example, you have to know which step you need to go to look at where your job status is. The logical step is a bit complex compared to other tools. It's much easier to get a graphical view, but with ODI, it's graphical, plus you have to know all the other pieces that fit around it. You have to think about the logical and physical aspects."
"There are certain things where it can be improved. Initial solution setup seems a bit complex at the start, it should be improved because it becomes bit tough for a novice to get started on this. Sometimes error description is not helpful to understand the problem it gives some generic type of errors which are at times not that helpful to understand the underlying root cause of the issue."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
