We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Informatica PowerCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The most valuable aspects of Informatica PowerCenter are the many features, ease of use, and user-friendliness."
"Technical support is great. It's one of the reasons we really like them. When you compare support from IBM and support from Informatica, Informatica is much better."
"The number of docs has been reduced drastically, which is very good."
"It works with any multi-databases, so it works with Sybase, SQL Server. Also, the performance is really good and it is easy to use."
"It provides everything I need. Nothing is missing. PowerCenter is a good tool for on-premise databases."
"Good interface, reasonable documentation."
"Informatica PowerCenter is very good for integrating a huge amount of data in a very short duration, such as a minute. It is also very easy to use. After you provide the source and the target, mappings are automatically done, which makes it easy to use for the development team."
"One of the most valuable features for us is the metadata repository because it can easily understand the lineage of first target mapping. My company and I also find Informatica really easy to use—when a consultant joins our company, in just a few days to a few weeks, they can understand how to use it—so we prefer to use this ETL tool."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"The UI is outdated and old-fashioned, at least in our current version. Also, we have experienced some stability issues with the Workflow Monitor application."
"Its scalability can be improved. It is not scalable."
"The multiple interfaces in Informatica PowerCenter are not great for the user experience. Because of this, I think it can cause confusion for any beginner developer."
"We had stability issues, mostly with JVM size."
"It would be good to recreate the entire interface to make it easier for users to build workflows."
"The reputation of Informatica is that it is expensive."
"Informatica PowerCenter could improve by having a single interface because half of the system is still in the legacy interface and many other elements are moved to the developer client. It would be good if there was a single interface for the end user and developers."
"In terms of performance improvement and tuning, there should be a bit more guidance and documentation."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 3rd in Data Integration with 78 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Databricks and AWS Glue. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Informatica PowerCenter report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.