We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The stability is very good."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected."
"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."
"You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard."
"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."
"I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part."
"Even if an endpoint loses connection to the Internet, I know that endpoint is protected against 99.99% of the threats in the wild today."
"I've found the AI engine in CylancePROTECT to be particularly effective for technology and in preventing unknown threats."
"The solution is very quick at easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and the server."
"The pricing, if compared to other products, is cheap."
"It has a clean and clear interface."
"The tools and the features available with this solution are very competitive. It is always updated to prevent upcoming attacks."
"There are some great features in ESET Endpoint Antivirus when you are browsing on the internet. For example, they have a notification if within your LAN network something is suspected to be a threat. Additionally, the malware features are very good."
"The stability is good."
"ESET Endpoint Security's best feature is that it's invisible until it detects a problem."
"The solution has a very good endpoint feature."
"In terms of the current global landscape, it is a great solution."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"The SIEM could be improved."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"CylancePROTECT could be improved in its technical support and communication."
"It should provide more details about the events that they have detected."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"Additionally, their channel management has been lacking, with a notable disregard for small and medium-sized businesses, focusing primarily on large enterprises and very large MSPs."
"The solution needs better dashboards that are easier to use."
"We would like to see secure integration and multi-factor authentication to be able to access the administration dashboard."
"The initial deployment was quite complicated."
"It needs real analysis of quarantined files. The EDR product isn't showing much right now."
"They could improve the solution by adding better ransomware features."
"The solution can improve the modules, and it is lacking centralized management and visibility of the endpoints."
"In terms of what is lacking in ESET, it really would need more features for the users when they are working outside of the corporate network."
"I'm not aware of any areas that need improvement."
"There are no areas for improvement. It does everything the consumer needs."
"ESET should consider giving it application control."
"I don't know if it's possible but I'm always looking for better protection."
"In the future, a cloud version of the solution would be great."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint. See our CylancePROTECT vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.