Azure Site Recovery vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable.""They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.""The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards.""It is a very stable product and very scalable.""Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.""Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery.""Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery.""The solution is very easy to use."

More Azure Site Recovery Pros →

"Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful.""The solution is stable.""We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pros →

Cons
"The tool should improve synchronization.""Could have more integration with other platforms.""The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing.""In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement.""The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional.""We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.""Site Recovery's scalability could be improved.""The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."

More Azure Site Recovery Cons →

"They need better reporting on the environment.""I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers.""The pricing could be better."

More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
  • "I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."
  • "The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
  • "They have a license to pay."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
  • More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Besides the license, there are additional costs with the network connection. The customer may want a direct connection between the two data centers and that has an extra cost."
  • "I always want it to be cheaper."
  • More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
    Top Answer:The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the solution should provide ease of use to its users and try to be a complete solution… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is a bit expensive. Not all customers can afford it. I can't speak about the actual cost. That's handled by our sales department.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,122
    Comparisons
    861
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    463
    Comparisons
    355
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    459
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Nutanix Xi Leap
    Learn More
    Overview

    Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

    Nutanix Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) is a fully managed DR service that eliminates the need for a dedicated DR site, minimizes data loss and downtime, and helps organizations meet RTO/RPO SLAs confidently.
    Sample Customers
    Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
    JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Government8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 3 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service writes "Performs well, easy to manage, resilient, and the technical support is helpful". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is most compared with VMware SRM, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Veeam Backup & Replication and Datto Cloud Continuity. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report.

    See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.