We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful."
"The solution is stable."
"We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"They need better reporting on the environment."
"I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers."
"The pricing could be better."
More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 3 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service writes "Performs well, easy to manage, resilient, and the technical support is helpful". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is most compared with VMware SRM, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Veeam Backup & Replication and Datto Cloud Continuity. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.