We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is that it provides a GUI format with a drag-and-drop feature."
"The key role for Glue is that it hosts our metadata before rolling out our actual data. This is the major advantage of using this solution and our clients client have been very satisfied with it."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"The solution is serverless so it allows us to transform data while optimizing the cost and performance of Spark jobs."
"One of the best features of the solution is its ability to easily integrate with other AWS services."
"What I like best about AWS Glue is its real-time data backup feature. Last week, there was a production push, and what used to take almost ten days to send out around fifty-six thousand emails now takes only two hours."
"I like that it's flexible, powerful, and allows you to write your own queries and scripts to get the needed transformations."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"It is stable and scalable."
"It is not clear how the partition discovery would have been affected by more data coming in."
"We face performance issues when using AWS Glue for data transformation and integration."
"There should be more connectors for different databases."
"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"Overall, I consider the technical support to be fine, although the response time could be faster in certain cases."
"The solution should offer features for streaming data in addition to batching data."
"The crucial problem with AWS Glue is that it only works with AWS. It is not an agnostic tool like Pentaho. In PowerCenter, we can install the forms from Google and other vendors, but in the case of AWS Glue, we can only use AWS."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our AWS Glue vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
