We performed a comparison between Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 and Microsoft DPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Veeam Software, N-able and others in SaaS Backup."The most valuable feature includes leaving the stub files behind and integrating that with the recenter feature."
"The solution has good scalability."
"Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is easy to use."
"The stability has always been very good."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pros →
"I like the core backup feature. I also like the file server backup feature. I find Microsoft DPM interesting because it has fantastic integration with Microsoft products. For example, in Exchange and SharePoint, DPM is excellent when it comes to backing up data. It also does a decent job with open-source products."
"The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require."
"The solution backs up Microsoft workloads as well as anything on the market."
"It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor."
"The most valuable feature is the recovery."
"Microsoft DPM is scalable."
"This solution helps us to manage all of the operations across servers and different workstations."
"The initial setup is quite straightforward."
"The user experience needs a little refreshing touch."
"I think the solution itself keeps up with everything else. Sometimes it would be nice if they could move a little bit quicker and have faster updates, but in terms of the features, it's absolutely fine and adequate."
"The solution's updates and rollouts of the patches cause a lot of problems."
"We need more options for the backup schedule."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Cons →
"Microsoft DPM could improve if it was available in a public or private cloud."
"Additional Hyper-V knowledge would be great."
"The user interface can be improved quite a bit."
"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with open source and competitor products. In the next release, I would like to see some data governance frameworks. It should have support features for data integration and data replication like Veeam. Right now, we are also using Veeam for certain scenarios."
"The problem lies with the 2019 version, it's the file system they’re using."
"We can't take a snapshot and take it outside, which is a problem."
"Compatibility and integration with other products needs improvement."
"The data tagging feature needs improvement. The solution could be a bit more intuitive in certain aspects."
More Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is ranked 13th in SaaS Backup with 4 reviews while Microsoft DPM is ranked 27th in Backup and Recovery with 17 reviews. Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is rated 8.2, while Microsoft DPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 writes "Allows for storage optimization and archiving functionality of DocAve Backup is valuable for organizations with large amounts of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft DPM writes "Good for backing up, but the 2019 version lags". Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365 is most compared with Code42 Incydr, IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, Veeam Backup & Replication and Commvault Cloud, whereas Microsoft DPM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Azure Backup, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Veritas Backup Exec and Commvault Cloud.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
