Automic Workload Automation vs Stonebranch comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 12, 2023

We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation and Stonebranch Universal Automation Center based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: Automic Workload Automation is highly appreciated for its strong and flexible capability, scalability, and straightforward setup process. It provides extensive control over various operating systems and products, accompanied by pre-designed templates and convenient access through web browsers. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center stands out in terms of efficiency, visually appealing graphical representation, and the capability to establish dependencies between different tasks. It offers an intuitive solution, regularly enhances its software, and provides valuable technical support.

Automic Workload Automation has room for improvement in terms of industry standardization, plug-and-play automation processes, language support, functionality, user interface, web-based edition, manage file transfer area, and pricing. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center could enhance its offerings by providing cloud deployment, improving analytics, offering a mobile app for task monitoring, and collaborating with the vendor for future releases.

Service and Support: The customer service for Automic Workload Automation has garnered varying feedback, as some customers encountered challenges when trying to contact the support team. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is widely commended for its exceptional and consistently accessible technical support.

Ease of Deployment: The setup for Automic Workload Automation can take anywhere from one to five days, depending on the project size. The setup for Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is considered average in terms of ease, with the deployment process lasting approximately six months. Implementation can take one to two years.

Pricing: Automic Workload Automation has a high setup cost. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is more affordable compared to its rivals, making it a favored option among businesses.

ROI: Automic Workload Automation did not offer specific ROI figures, but the user opted not to renew the license in order to reduce costs. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center led to a cost reduction.

Comparison Results: Automic Workload Automation is favored over Stonebranch Universal Automation Center. Users appreciate Automic's strength, scalability, and ease of implementation, as well as its extensive features and architecture. Automic is considered user-friendly with a simple interface.

To learn more, read our detailed Automic Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Automic is perfect to work with for a lot of job loads.""It's easy to train other people. A new developer could come in and learn it very quickly.""The very special feature that we use is the connection to ServiceNow.""Automic Workload Automation is a highly complex yet versatile tool.""It has greatly increased our efficiencies and productivity, and reduced the amount of human interaction required.""It improves the visibility of what is going on on the system. If I have a problem, it is easy to identify, understand dependencies, and identifying the root causes than just running through scripts and searching through applications or servers.""It's a scheduling tool on steroids. We can have a job run at certain times. If it fails, reset it a number of times and then send an e-mail. Send e-mails on any type of event. Calendar creation, schedule things on certain days, year-end stuff, period end. It's endless, really.""We are able to control and change our processes when necessary."

More Automic Workload Automation Pros →

"The ability to monitor tasks that are on the open-system side as well as our mainframe side gives us a one-window view of all our processes.""The tasks are incredibly capable, and as long as you name them with a nice, uniform naming convention, they are very useful. You can create some interesting workflows through various machines, or you can just have it kick off single tasks. All in all, I really like the Universal Task. You can do some mutually exclusive stuff, such as an "A not B" kind of thing. It has a lot of capabilities behind the scenes.""We lean a lot on the multi-tenancy that they offer within the product, the ability to get other people to self-manage their estate, versus having a central team do all the scheduling.""The support is good from Stonebranch Universal Automation Center.""I like the dashboard and the various workflows.""The features are upgraded, and every six months they're releasing patches.""When it comes to agent technology and compatibility with other vendors, from a platform perspective it was the one vendor that fit all the platforms that we have, from your old platforms - mainframe, NSK, IBM i - to the new ones, going into cloud and container""The most valuable feature is the reliability of the agents, because we need them accessible and we need to run stuff. The agent technology and compatibility are top-notch."

More Stonebranch Pros →

Cons
"We would like some advantages, which we had with the Java UI, with the automation engine.""There is one missing part in the product concerning recurring tasks. You can schedule a recurring task by a context action, and run it as recurrent, but it creates a time container which can be quit and disappears.""It seems still very technical to get the full features out... Once you get to some of the leadership levels, such as myself, you don't have time to go digging into it. It would be nice to have some additional performance features such as reporting, analytics.""There are pain points, like anything else. Sometimes, things they say work, and sometimes, they don't work. You need to find out why they don't work and then go back and have them fixed.""It has a very complicated interface, which could be made to be more user-friendly.""In most of the packages available, it took time to study and gain knowledge of the features and resources due to poor documentation.""I'm not sure what data they use to make time estimates. However, most of the time it is not accurate. It's either way too long or way too short.""When you want to use the entirety of Automic, it is heavy."

More Automic Workload Automation Cons →

"There is a component called the OMS, which is the message broker. We rely on infrastructure, resiliency, and availability for that piece. If that could change to be highly available just as a software component, so that we don't have to provide the high-available storage, etc. for it, that would be a plus. It would just be cheaper to run.""It can be hard to manage the task monitor.""There is room for improvement with its connectivity with the Microsoft SRS system. It is very weak. They keep telling us it works with it, and technically it does, but it does not provide a lot of visibility. We have lost a lot of visibility migrating to Stonebranch, compared with just running tasks on the SRS server. That's really about the only thing that is a sore point for us.""I would rate Stonebranch somewhere in the middle for ease of setup. It wasn't too straightforward for us because our infrastructure is complex.""It would be ideal if they had the exact same features as the CA Workload Automation DE series. It would be helpful to have calendaring options.""It's not available on the cloud, so they should take that due to safety, security, and scalability.""I have a request regarding our agent on the mainframe. It may time out when communicating to the Universal Controller, when the mainframe is extremely busy. That can cause a task which is running at that time to not see the results of the job that ran on the mainframe. It happens sporadically during times of really busy CPU usage. We're expecting that enhancement from them in the fourth quarter.""One hiccup we've had is due to the fact that we have other internal scheduling tools. We're able to talk to them, but we have trouble with some of the networking between them, so we're still trying to work out the kinks there."

More Stonebranch Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there."
  • "Do your own proof of concept. Make sure you know what you want. Be clear about what you want the product to do for you. Go out and meet with the vendor, then test it."
  • "The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."
  • "It costs to scale. While, it is scalable, the add-ons are expensive."
  • "It has helped us reduce costs."
  • "You do not need any humans to start jobs, so you can save a lot of money."
  • "We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."
  • "We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."
  • More Automic Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost."
  • "Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs."
  • "I don't have pricing information, but I do know it's cheaper than our old legacy system. Other than the standard licensing fees there are no additional costs."
  • "We're transaction-based, as far as our licensing goes. We have 50,000 transactions a month and our licensing cost is $55,000 a year..."
  • "The price of the solution is at a medium level compared to the competition."
  • "Stonebranch is cheaper than Control-M, so many companies are using Stonebranch."
  • More Stonebranch Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.
    Top Answer:The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our requirements. They did provide us with an unlimited license that matched our budget.
    Top Answer:The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's part of the reason we moved to Stonebranch. They have more analytic capabilities… more »
    Top Answer:We like that it has GUI and is not just a command line.
    Top Answer:The pricing is good. I would rate it eight out of ten. The pricing is similar to AutoSys. It's lower than Redwood, which was on the higher side in terms of pricing.
    Top Answer:It can be hard to manage the task monitor. We are still working with the vendor, and we are trying to make the changes as per our requirements. We are asking them to build some new solutions so they… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    4,737
    Comparisons
    2,486
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    661
    Rating
    8.3
    16th
    out of 49 in Workload Automation
    Views
    3,058
    Comparisons
    1,288
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    499
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Automic Dollar Universe
    Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
    Learn More
    Overview

    Broadcom's Automic Workload Automation (AWA) stands out as a robust and advanced solution in the field of workload automation and orchestration. Designed for complex enterprise environments, it enables organizations to automate, manage, and optimize their IT workflows and business processes. This solution is particularly beneficial for IT professionals and business executives seeking to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual workload, and drive digital transformation.

    Automic Workload Automation offers a unified platform for managing diverse tasks across various environments and applications. This centralization simplifies the orchestration of workflows, enhancing visibility and control. IT professionals appreciate this feature as it allows for streamlined management and more efficient resource utilization. AWA's architecture is designed to scale with the growing demands of businesses. It supports a broad range of applications and platforms, making it a versatile tool for different IT environments.

    AWA's analytics and reporting capabilities provide deep insights into workflow performance and potential bottlenecks. This aspect is particularly valuable for data-driven decision-making, helping organizations to optimize processes and improve overall efficiency. The ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide array of applications, databases, and systems, facilitates smooth and automated workflows across various IT landscapes, crucial for enterprises that utilize a mix of legacy and modern applications.

    Automic Workload Automation users on PeerSpot.com have highlighted several strengths; IT professionals frequently commend its robust scheduling capabilities, noting that it handles complex dependencies and scenarios with ease. The intuitive user interface is also frequently mentioned, simplifying the task of managing and monitoring automated workflows. Business executives, on the other hand, appreciate the solution's contribution to strategic business initiatives, such as digital transformation and cloud migration, due to its advanced automation capabilities.

      The Stonebranch Workload Automation solution, part of our Universal Automation Center platform, helps organizations automate, manage, and orchestrate their IT processes - across hybrid IT environments. 


      1. Workflow Orchestration and Automation: Holistically control scripts, jobs, tasks, and IT processes running across your on-prem, hybrid cloud, and/or multi-cloud environments.

      2. Real-Time Automation: With our event-driven automation technology, it is now possible to achieve real-time automation across your entire hybrid IT environment.

      3. Self-Service Automation: With a focus on ease-of-use, you can empower your workforce with self-service automation using member roles and permissions.

      4. BI & Analytics: Centralize operational control and insight with proactive monitoring, reporting, and alerts

      Product Features:

      - Drag-and-drop Workflow Creation: You don’t have to be a developer to create automation. Custom scripting is a thing of the past. Easily create workflows with an intuitive drag-and-drop user interface.

      - DevOps enabled: Align priorities between IT Ops and DevOps with Jobs-as-Code, Infrastructure-as-Code, and bundle-and-promote features.

      - Limitless 3rd Party Integrations: Integrate into any platform or application from the mainframe to the cloud. Use pre-packaged integrations, build your own, or download integration blueprints from the community-driven opensource marketplace.

      - Available on-premises or as a SaaS-based deployment, the UAC is a modern platform built to scale with your business.

      Sample Customers
      ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
      Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm29%
      Manufacturing Company13%
      Insurance Company11%
      Retailer11%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm22%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Retailer6%
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm36%
      Insurance Company12%
      Computer Software Company12%
      Manufacturing Company12%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm26%
      Computer Software Company15%
      Insurance Company8%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise17%
      Large Enterprise67%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business13%
      Midsize Enterprise12%
      Large Enterprise75%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business4%
      Midsize Enterprise18%
      Large Enterprise79%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business16%
      Midsize Enterprise10%
      Large Enterprise74%
      Buyer's Guide
      Automic Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Automic Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
      765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews while Stonebranch is ranked 16th in Workload Automation with 26 reviews. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while Stonebranch is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Stonebranch writes "Allowed us to develop workflows without having to train and develop very specialized skillsets". Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation and Redwood RunMyJobs, whereas Stonebranch is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, Control-M, Redwood RunMyJobs, ESP Workload Automation Intelligence and VisualCron. See our Automic Workload Automation vs. Stonebranch report.

      See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

      We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.