Automai AppLoader vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automai AppLoader and OpenText UFT Developer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Load Testing Tools Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Automai AppLoader?
Eitan Gold
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."
  • "The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."
  • "The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."
  • "When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."
  • "It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."
  • "The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."
  • "Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."
  • "The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."
  • More OpenText UFT Developer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. It is affordable and average.
    Top Answer:Object definition and recognition need improvement, especially with calendar controls. I faced challenges with schedulers and calendars.
    Ranking
    21st
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    134
    Comparisons
    113
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    16th
    Views
    3,361
    Comparisons
    2,036
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AppLoader, NRG Global AppLoader
    Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
    Learn More
    Overview
    We believe that testing your applications should be as easy as using them. Forget everything you know about testing, and imagine the cleanest way to test any application. That's what we did when we created AppLoader. Now, you don't need to plug in at the protocol level, or write a single line of code. Now you can test ANY of your applications with a simple solution that uses smart technology to get accurate results. Our approach is simple: Test what the user sees. Knows what works, and more importantly what doesn't work. One install will test all application layers: Citrix, third party applications, Virtual Desktop, mobile apps. Also integrates well with the leading testing and monitoring tools. Although we do not heavily market, we are well known through referrals. AppLoader will work when other products don't. Even HP consulting uses AppLoader for difficult apps. Try on your most challenging application. Free POC available here: https://www.nrgglobal.com/load-testing-tool-apploader-poc
    With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.
    Sample Customers
    Ellie Mae, Meditech, HP Consulting, ESRI, Fox, UCLA, Baylor Health Care Systems
    Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Load Testing Tools
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automai AppLoader is ranked 21st in Load Testing Tools while OpenText UFT Developer is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 34 reviews. Automai AppLoader is rated 0.0, while OpenText UFT Developer is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT Developer writes "Integrates well, has LeanFT library, and good object detection ". Automai AppLoader is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Apache JMeter, whereas OpenText UFT Developer is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Silk Test and froglogic Squish.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.