We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software."The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"The security is great."
"Large amounts of data can be moved pretty fast using the solution."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."
"I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc."
"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"The availability could be better."
"The solution needs improvement on performance."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 11th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 7 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 38 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
