We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"The product gives us a lot of insight."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."
"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."
More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is ranked 8th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable One Exposure Management Platform writes "A highly scalable and reasonably priced solution that provides insight into user activities". AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, SafeBreach, Cymulate and Fortra's Cobalt Strike, whereas Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Pentera and Picus Security.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
