We performed a comparison between Atmos [EOL] and Box based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Nasuni, Google and others in Cloud Storage."This is a scalable solution that can handle petabytes of information and millions of stored objects at multiple locations."
"The solution is scalable."
"The system's performance is impressive, and file sharing is notably straightforward."
"Using Box for cloud storage allows us to focus on the service and maintaining infrastructure."
"We've never had a penetration. We've never had a security issue that their support didn't solve. We love their audit trail. We can know exactly when a collaborator opens. We love how you can define a collaborator."
"I like the ease of use."
"File sharing with collaborators not on the same domain with offline access from multiple devices: I work on many projects that are multi-organizational, such as with customers, suppliers, or acquisitions."
"I like that Box makes it easy to deploy virtual machines."
"Sharing and collaborating across files and folders has been a massive game changer."
"Our clients need the flexibility to easily move from Atmos to AWS and GCP and then back from GCP to AWS to Atmos."
"Tasks and comments could be easier to see, report, search, and manage."
"Like all cloud platforms, there are always areas of improvement around sync to local devices."
"The room for improvement is in the area of integrations. They need to establish more integrations, especially with Office 365 and Outlook."
"Improvements in speed - Box's high level of security impacts performance, especially when compared with other similar services."
"I would love to see the ability to invite collaborators extended to a file level, not just the folder level."
"The solution's data security should be improved."
"The UI should be faster. Sometimes it lags when switching between documents."
"One thing that Box would benefit from is a records management component."
Earn 20 points
Atmos [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage while Box is ranked 8th in Cloud Storage with 37 reviews. Atmos [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Box is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atmos [EOL] writes "Flexible in deployment, scalable, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Box writes "Used for data storage and data collaboration, but its data security could be improved". Atmos [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte.
See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.