We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is that it is easy to configure. Additionally, with the same configuration with Cisco and Ruckus, we can receive 55 to 60 percent more out of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the streaming of screen sharing."
"There is a clustering feature, so the APs immediately switch back to the next available controller. The users will not notice any impact and will feel connected to the network. They will not notice any disconnection."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management. It has features like other solutions, but it's easier to manage. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN also has a tax asset benefit which is good."
"I believe their Adaptive Radio Management (ARM) in its current form provides the best automated management of transmit power and channel. It does a really good job of managing proper design and wireless environment."
"I like the solution's ability to add multiple SSIDs on different levels such as enterprise and guest networks."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It eliminates the need for additional controllers, reducing costs."
"The pricing of the product is very, very reasonable."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"It is highly scalable. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"The initial setup of Cambium is straightforward."
"From the commercial-side the pricing side is fine but in other aspects, it could be lowered."
"This product needs more flecibility with switching technologies."
"The price for the license could be a bit improved since it is the only area with an issue."
"Deployment can take some time if you haven't planned well."
"They have to work on their Aruba Central cloud platform. There are still some glitches such as not showing proper user details. When we removed the AP from the Aruba Central cloud, it showed up as being connected to Aruba Central. They need to fix these issues."
"The internet signal and the connection can be better."
"Sometimes, the configuration part of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be complex, and if you fail to understand the product at once, you may not even know about some features that you can apply to your network, and they may go unused."
"The issue is that we are unable to update it because we lack the necessary permissions. We set up the website, but we don't have permission to download the software."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement."
"The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 46 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 23 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.