Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response and Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Networks, Palo Alto Networks, Netsurion and others in SOC as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed SOC as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Arctic Wolf is our eyes and ears 24/7 because we can't possibly watch all of our alerts. We may see all of these alerts, but our attention is distracted because we're working on other things.""The integration between Cisco AMPs and the Windows servers is most valuable. So, they can also sandbox machines on which they see something suspicious.""After an easy onboarding, the monitoring started immediately.""The product provides integrations with several different SaaS applications.""The tool's most valuable feature is its ease of implementation.""They have a portal where you can evaluate and mitigate any vulnerabilities that you and your network might have.""Having quarterly meetings with the team to review the last 90 days and determine what if any changes need to be made.""This service makes answering audits much easier since it covers so many security best practices."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response Pros →

"The technical aspects and the features of this product are all good.""The solution offers good device control.""The most valuable feature is the management portal.""The most valuable features are the firewall and the IPS.""This product has a feature-rich environment that fill the needs of those looking for antivirus but it is more than just a solution for antivirus and cybersecurity services.""The solution is very easy to use. It's not very complicated."

More Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"They focus on detecting administrator-level control compromises. Because they're focusing more on administrator-level compromise, they are less able to see if an individual user has been compromised. It is, admittedly, very difficult because they don't know what normal human behavior is. If a hacker compromises a human account and then acts just like the human, how are you ever going to notice, unless you have some inside knowledge of how the company works? For example, they overlook account lockouts on user accounts, whereas in our own alerting system, we do not. We review every account lockout, and if it is bad, we contact the person, whereas they think of that as noise because they're more focused on the administrator-level compromise.""Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response's analysis and remediation parts could be improved. It's not bad, but it needs improvement.""I can't think of any specific features that they need to add at the moment. As long as they continue to develop new solutions to support different operating systems and technologies, we are satisfied with their service. We appreciate the effort they put into adding new features and functionality to their service and believe they are doing a great job in providing us with all the necessary tools and resources to stay secure.""We need an easier way to audit and act on agents.""I would like to see them build the ability to co-sell an EDR platform, manage an EDR or manage the actual response, potentially from the issues that are coming up from the security risks.""In the future, I would like to see a summary report.""If you are not in the security field, this can be difficult to figure out from time to time.""It would be great if the whole process of determining vendor risk could be simplified by Arctic Wolf."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response Cons →

"The reporting has fallen behind competing products and needs to be updated to meet or beat the competition.""This solution needs to improve with respect to zero-day attack response.""Technical support is the one thing about this solution that is not good.""The solution needs to improve its reporting functionality. That's lacking right now. They need to change the layout or make it more functional.""The stability of the solution could use a lot of improvement. It was our biggest concern.""As far as new ransomware and the next-generation malware is concerned, Symantec is not quite up to the mark."

More Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is more expensive than CrowdStrike, but it also has more features. I don't remember the amount, but I do remember that it was on the higher side. I believe we have five sensors, and the sensors have a yearly cost. We don't have any additional costs, but I know that if we have more features, they will add to the cost."
  • "I find their pricing to be reasonable and competitive."
  • "The pricing is fair."
  • "I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."
  • "The pricing is pretty competitive."
  • More Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The list price is approximately $50 USD annually per user."
  • "Currently, we are paying about $3,000-$4,000 yearly. I don't believe there are costs above the standard licensing fee."
  • More Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOC as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The agents give pretty good visibility into what is happening at the endpoint.
    Top Answer:It will be helpful if the dashboard is more granular. The vendor must allow us to see what they see on their end.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    1st
    out of 27 in SOC as a Service
    Views
    726
    Comparisons
    436
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    587
    Rating
    9.2
    Unranked
    In SOC as a Service
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Arctic Wolf AWN CyberSOC
    Learn More
    Overview

    Built on the industry’s only cloud-native platform to deliver security operations as a concierge service, the Arctic Wolf® Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solution eliminates alert fatigue and false positives to promote a faster response with detection and response capabilities tailored to the specific needs of your organization. Your Arctic Wolf Concierge Security® Team (CST) works directly with you to perform threat hunting, incident response, and guided remediation, while also providing strategic recommendations uniquely customized for your environment.

    Technology alone may not stop advanced threats. You need security experts on hand to interpret and prioritize the critical events that need action. Your designated and highly specialized, in-region security analysts are available 24x7 to act as an extension of your team, continuously monitoring and hunting for advanced threats. Our analysts are some of the best-trained security experts in the world and they leverage state of the art technologies and global threat intelligence to minimize the business impact of cyber attacks. Detect, assess, and respond to attacks faster with Symantec Cyber Security Services.

    Sample Customers
    Agero, Madison Memorial Hospital, DLZ, Howard LLP, City of Sparks
    BayWa, Carrington Holding Company, Citizens Business Bank, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, FBL Financial, Molina Healthcare Inc., Pgi, Sealed Air, TSO cloud
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company31%
    Legal Firm15%
    Non Profit8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business76%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise45%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise57%
    Large Enterprise29%
    Buyer's Guide
    SOC as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Networks, Palo Alto Networks, Netsurion and others in SOC as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is ranked 1st in SOC as a Service with 17 reviews while Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in SOC as a Service. Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is rated 9.2, while Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response writes "Very good support, excellent visibility, and useful security bulletins". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] writes "Mature, stable, and reduces threats.Symantec Managed Security Services has been relatively easy to deploy and operate. Symantec's support is knowledgeable at the lowest tier and responsive". Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, Red Canary MDR, Huntress, SentinelOne Vigilance and Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting, whereas Symantec Cyber Security Services [EOL] is most compared with .

    We monitor all SOC as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.