IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs aqua comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between aqua and IBM Engineering Workflow Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."
  • "It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."
  • "It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."
  • More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
    Top Answer:Customers need to pay for a license to use this product. It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. We have about 7,800 tokens, and including maintenance… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    126
    Comparisons
    88
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    781
    Comparisons
    306
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,076
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    aqua ALM
    IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    BENEFITS

    •Usability as easy as email

    •Improved collaboration by integrating business owners within the project team

    •Follows customers processes and not vice versa

    •Very short training period

    •Project status reports in real-time

    •Full flexibility (SaaS or on premise)

    •High level of acceptance for all project team members

    •Critical chain multi project management

    AQUA ALM Solution

    •Open API

    •Enabled to integrate existing tools and solutions

    •Comprehensive reporting engine

    •Collect andpresent data from different sources

    •Innovative Agent technology

    •Access, control and manage test resources

    •3rd party extensibility

    •Different hosting options

    •SaaS enabled public or private cloud model

    •On-Premise

    aqua ALM is integrabile with:

    - SAP

    - Jira

    - Jenkins

    - jMeter

    - Selenium

    - Ranorex

    - SmartBear Tools

    - Toska

    and lots of more tools you need to test

    for more contact: sales@andagon.com

    IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

    Sample Customers
    Yapi Kredi, Berlin Hyp, megapharm, Crem Solutions, Takko Fashion, Omnicare, Markant
    Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    aqua is ranked 25th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is ranked 10th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 14 reviews. aqua is rated 0.0, while IBM Engineering Workflow Management is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of aqua writes "It has JMeter integration which provides visualizations during tests and instrumentation of each agent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Engineering Workflow Management writes "Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement ". aqua is most compared with , whereas IBM Engineering Workflow Management is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Codebeamer, GitLab and Polarion ALM.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.