Appvance IQ vs HCL AppScan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Appvance Logo
108 views|69 comparisons
HCLTech Logo
5,763 views|4,455 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Appvance IQ and HCL AppScan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan generates false results. Sometimes, it incorrectly identifies requests as vulnerable when they are not vulnerable. In the ADSL feature managed, the primary objective is to identify… more »
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan efficiently scans through the website and identifies vulnerabilities for AWS. It is reducing tools day by day, making it more efficient.
    Ranking
    Views
    108
    Comparisons
    69
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    5,763
    Comparisons
    4,455
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Selenium HQ logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Automaton logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    ReadyAPI logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Appvance
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Learn More
    Overview

    Appvance.ai is the leader in AI-driven testing, which is revolutionizing how software testing is performed. The company’s premier product is Appvance IQ™, the world’s first AI-driven, unified test automation system. AIQ empowers enterprises to improve the quality, performance and security of their apps, while transforming the efficiency and output of their testing teams.

    Appvance IQ was launched in late 2017, helping Appvance.ai to become among the fastest growing test automation companies in the world, and the leader in the new category of AI driven testing.

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Bell Canada, CBS, UBC, PepsiCo, 7-11, BenefitVision, Kabbage, Catalent Pharmaceuticals, McKesson, Veritas, Cherwell, QAT Global, Sony, SiriusXM, CoPart, Auto Parts Alliance, PPD
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government15%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Government16%
    Transportation Company16%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Appvance IQ is ranked 40th in Application Security Testing (AST) while HCL AppScan is ranked 12th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 39 reviews. Appvance IQ is rated 8.0, while HCL AppScan is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Appvance IQ writes "Network Emulation allows for performance testing of geographically-distributed users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". Appvance IQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Automaton, SmartBear TestComplete and ReadyAPI, whereas HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.