Appgate SDP vs Zscaler Private Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 31, 2023

We compared Appgate SDP and Zscaler Private Access across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:

  • Ease of Deployment: Appgate SDP's setup process can be time-consuming and intricate, potentially lasting for several days or even a week. Zscaler Private Access's initial setup is typically considered simple and uncomplicated, although it may become more complex in specific areas. Certain users suggest that the involvement of Zscaler-certified personnel or professional services might be necessary for a smoother implementation.
  • Features: Appgate SDP is highly praised for its adaptability, strength, and advanced configuration options. It provides effortless implementation, concealing of servers, and safeguards against lateral movement. Conversely, Zscaler Private Access is commended for its reliability, effective web filtering, and seamless connectivity without the need for a separate VPN agent.
  • Room for Improvement: Appgate SDP could enhance its cost, non-split tunnel functionality, enterprise-level solutions, cloud changes, and user interface. On the other hand, Zscaler Private Access could benefit from better notifications, a user-friendly interface, enhanced security, service integration, cost and licensing approach, and addressing internet access and latency issues.
  • Pricing: Appgate SDP has a fixed setup cost. In contrast, Zscaler Private Access offers flexible pricing based on the number of users and required features, with additional charges for each user.
  • ROI: Appgate SDP's ROI is unclear, whereas Zscaler Private Access is rated at seven out of ten, suggesting a more favorable ROI.
  • Service and Support: Appgate SDP's customer service is highly regarded for its technical assistance and quick response times. However, there is room for improvement according to some customers. On the other hand, Zscaler Private Access has received a variety of reviews, with some customers not requiring support and others giving it high ratings.

Comparison Results: Appgate SDP and Zscaler Private Access differ in terms of setup complexity and time consumption. Appgate SDP is known for its flexibility, robustness, and strong configuration capabilities, allowing for server hiding and prevention of lateral movement. Conversely, Zscaler Private Access is commended for its stability, cloud updates, and user-friendliness. Appgate SDP is considered costly, while opinions on Zscaler Private Access pricing vary. Improvement opportunities exist for Appgate SDP's user interface and support, as well as for Zscaler Private Access in notifications, interface, and security. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on specific needs and preferences.

To learn more, read our detailed Appgate SDP vs. Zscaler Private Access Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The flexibility of the tool is valuable. It is very robust. It has a very robust configuration capability.""The interface is really friendly. It's simple to understand.""It is a scalable solution...The support answers your questions very fast.""The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal effort.""One of the most important features is stopping lateral movement across our network.""It is pretty stable."

More Appgate SDP Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is the categorization of the dynamic URLs which keeps the customer's environment protected. The threats and the malware are correctly categorized.""The user interface of Zscaler Private Access is excellent. With proper knowledge and expertise, one can efficiently handle intricate enterprise environments without feeling overwhelmed. This leads to exceptional productivity for managed service providers. The user experience is remarkably streamlined, enabling the management of even the most complex enterprise setups without any excessive complications.""The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are its ability to integrate with multiple IDPs and application segmentation.""It is a stable solution.""The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get.""The Live Logs are a cool feature. We can directly identify issues and divert user traffic.""The product's most valuable features are cloud-based services and secure internet access. We don't have to set up any physical appliances.""The most valuable features are the File Type Control and SSL bypass policies. We"

More Zscaler Private Access Pros →

Cons
"One limitation is that it's harder to provide access to multiple applications in the company with Appgate, but that's probably because of poor management.""The user interface should be improved as it is not very easy to work with the updates.""One thing that kind of sticks out to me is the ability to do a proper non-split tunnel. VPN tunnel-wise, it is not really a true unsplit tunnel, but I think that's just because of the way it's designed. A split VPN basically allows your system to talk to other systems without being forced down the tunnel. A VPN running in a non-split tunnel mode forces all the traffic down the tunnel to wherever you're VPNing to. It forces the traffic down so that the traffic is subject to the firewall and rules that you have in your corporate environment and such. It helps to prevent remote malicious folks that may be talking directly to that box from piggybacking into the corporate environment through it. They do it partially, but it would be nice to see more of an enterprise-level solution there.""They could provide a single-box solution to manage tools for 4000 users. Additionally, they could add extra features to enhance remote micro connection.""It would be better to connect to an application portal from any device. Documentation and support could be better.""On the cloud, when you make some changes, it may be difficult."

More Appgate SDP Cons →

"There is improvement in enhancing proper manageability, policies, and logs. So, log management could be improved.""While Zscaler supports client-initiated connections, it does not support server-initiated connections. This is a feature that Zscaler may consider adding in the future.""I can't speak to any missing features.""More on-prem infrastructure is required when Zscaler Private Access is to be implemented as a single point of entry.""There could be more DLP-related features. Additionally, there needs to be flexibility for integrating ISP features.""Zscaler Private Access's reporting is poor. We should have more insight into the reports regarding what is blocked and allowed.""We'd like to have two-factor authentication that is quite simple.""What could be improved in Zscaler Private Access is its notification. For example, if there's a speed issue, there should be a pop-up that alerts the user about it. If there is a network quality issue, for example, it isn't good enough to connect to, or the network quality is bad, there should be a notification from the solution. Zscaler Private Access also needs improvement in terms of its interface and security."

More Zscaler Private Access Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so."
  • "We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17."
  • "The pricing is according to the market price. It is not a very cheap solution. They have some very aggressive promotions to sell the product in the market."
  • More Appgate SDP Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
  • "The cost is expensive. It depends on the number of users."
  • "My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."
  • "The price is competitive."
  • "In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."
  • "Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The technical support is good."
  • More Zscaler Private Access Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is according to the market price. It is not a very cheap solution. They have some very aggressive promotions to sell the product in the market.
    Top Answer:They could provide a single-box solution to manage tools for 4000 users. Additionally, they could add extra features to enhance remote micro connection.
    Top Answer: We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.
    Top Answer:Zscaler Private Access needs to improve its collaboration with applications without compromising security. The solution needs to improve native security, seamless protection, and user experience… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    1,936
    Comparisons
    1,264
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    8.8
    2nd
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    7,395
    Comparisons
    5,837
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    414
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Appgate SDP is a network access control tool for local and remote access, multifactor authentication, and micro-segmentation. It is a flexible, robust, and configurable tool with good documentation, interface improvements, and ease of deployment. 

    It helps organizations prevent lateral movement across networks and servers and provides a more granular access control structure than traditional VPNs. Appgate SDP's valuable features include the ability to hide servers, good support, stability, scalability, and stopping lateral movement. It is currently being used as the main VPN solution for many companies.

    Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) is a top ZTNA service solution that redefines private application access with advanced connectivity, segmentation, and security capabilities to protect your business from threats while providing a great user experience.

    Zscaler Private Access Features

    ZPA has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:


    • Risk-based policy engine: Continuously validate access policies based on user, device, content, and application risk posture with a powerful native policy engine to ensure only valid, authenticated users can access private applications.


    • Unified client and clientless access: Choose the optimal method of protection for your hybrid environment. Client-based access ensures managed users are protected even when they are off the corporate network through a lightweight agent, the Zscaler Client Connector. Clientless access provides unmanaged users with frictionless app access from any device and web browser, no client needed.


    • Browser access: Allow BYOD and third-party users to freely use their own devices to seamlessly and securely access internal apps leveraging any web browser, no client needed.


    • Disaster recovery: Uninterrupted access to mission-critical applications even during a black swan event with a customer-controlled business continuity solution creating the access path to critical private applications through ZPA Private Service Edge.


    Zscaler Private Access Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing ZPA. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:


    • Boost hybrid workforce productivity: Fast, seamless access to private apps whether you’re at home, in the office, or anywhere else.
    • Mitigate the risk of a data breach: Minimize the attack surface and lateral movement by making applications invisible to attackers while enforcing least-privileged access.


    • Stop the most advanced adversaries: First-of-its-kind private app protection minimizes the risk of compromised users and active attackers.


    • Extend zero trust across apps, workloads, and devices: Zscaler Private Access is a complete ZTNA platform that brings least-privileged access to private apps, workloads, and OT/IIoT devices.


    • Reduce operational complexity: The solution’s cloud-native platform eliminates legacy VPNs that are difficult to scale, manage, and configure.


    • Exceptional user experience: By providing consistently fast connectivity that doesn’t require logging in and out of VPN clients, remote users gain a faster, more secure access experience.



    Reviews from Real Users

    ZPA is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it is user-friendly, has good connectivity, and has other helpful features such as web filtering.

    Senthilkumar B., Technical Consultant at a tech vendor, shares what he finds most valuable about the solution. “[It is] user-friendly, easy to customize, and simple to implement.”

    “Its connectivity as a VPN is its most valuable feature,” says Harjinder S., Sr. Architect at a tech vendor.

    Another PeerSpot user, Ben A., Cloud Architect Azure at Thales, mentions “The integration with cloud providers, like Azure or GCP, is easy. The Live Logs are a cool feature. We can directly identify issues and divert user traffic.

    Inderjeet S., Administrator at a tech vendor, says, “[The solution has] “good web filtering and good internet security notifications with a nice interface.” He also adds, “There aren’t too many bugs, and it is easy to debug when necessary. There are good Outlook features available. The scalability has been good.”

    Sample Customers
    United States Air Force  FINRA Weight Watchers Rackspace  DataDog SageNet  Verdant Norwegian Cruise Line  VoiceBase  The Third Floor 
    NOV, Growmark, Paychex, MAN Energy Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company43%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Outsourcing Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Appgate SDP vs. Zscaler Private Access
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Appgate SDP vs. Zscaler Private Access and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Appgate SDP is ranked 11th in ZTNA as a Service with 6 reviews while Zscaler Private Access is ranked 2nd in ZTNA as a Service with 21 reviews. Appgate SDP is rated 8.8, while Zscaler Private Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Appgate SDP writes "Helps us manage traffic-related issues and streamlines access management for the network ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Private Access writes "A VPN alternative that delivers a zero trust model". Appgate SDP is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter, Akamai Enterprise Application Access and Netskope Private Access, whereas Zscaler Private Access is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Axis Security, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, OpenVPN Access Server and Cato SASE Cloud Platform. See our Appgate SDP vs. Zscaler Private Access report.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.