We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Application Analytics and SAP IT Operations Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics."The analytics are great."
"It's pretty stable."
"All the metrics are baselines in networks, infrastructure, application, and user experience. AppDynamics offers its own query language. It is called ADQL. You can write code of any kind to do queries and analysis and you can use those within the reporting or within other research."
"Provides good overall application performance and transaction errors."
"Application Analytics' most valuable features are the real-user monitoring and the agents installed in the software stack on the application server."
"We had no issues with scalability. It was very good for us."
"Immediately allows you to see the relationships between the different nodes."
"Operations Analytics provides statistics, so it's like the dashboard in your car that tells you the temperature, RPMs, etc, and if something goes wrong in your car, a warning light comes on. So in analytics, you set thresholds for the thread count, and it sends you an email when it reaches a certain amount."
"We can integrate different environments, including development, quality, and production. You can open implementation projects, define users' roles, manage training, design, and store all project-related documentation. Before going live, there's a checklist and cutover plan. Configuration moves from development to quality, then production, to ensure everything runs smoothly. Once in production, the platform tracks system performance, open cases, maintenance, upgrades, and new features. You can monitor everything through dashboards, reports, event notifications, and support tickets, both internally and with SAP."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The challenge in the installation is that you have to configure a lot of things manually. The way you install and configure it is not straightforward."
"The user experience is quite confusing. There are too many different development stages. The UI is not very intuitive."
"Customization requires a few manual tweaks."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"Application Analytics' performance in pure and native cloud environments could be improved."
"This feature needs to be properly described to a client, and then the client needs to have a use case. There are some clients which do not need it and some clients who do. It is not for everyone and is dependant on their use case."
"The solution works well, but we need better project planning. Accessing some features is a bit complicated, and we're waiting for improvements from SAP. It should also improve integration."
"It would be great to have a monitoring tool that could implement conditional solutions like this. Right now, it comes up with the indicators, but it doesn't necessarily send the lower-level technician to the right spot."
More AppDynamics Application Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics Application Analytics is ranked 9th in IT Operations Analytics with 11 reviews while SAP IT Operations Analytics is ranked 15th in IT Operations Analytics with 2 reviews. AppDynamics Application Analytics is rated 8.2, while SAP IT Operations Analytics is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Application Analytics writes "Offers very good application performance and features which reflect backend health". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP IT Operations Analytics writes "Helps to track the lifecycle of SAP products from inception to end-of-life". AppDynamics Application Analytics is most compared with , whereas SAP IT Operations Analytics is most compared with Moogsoft.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
