We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms."I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable."
"I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."
"It is very stable."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"The product is mostly stable."
"It is much easier to develop applications with the product’s IDE."
"The technical support is perfect."
"I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
"We have no complaints surrounding both the scalability and stability of this solution."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution."
"Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."
"The largest obstacle currently associated with OutSystems is its high cost and limited availability of skilled personnel. Despite being a rapid application development platform, having a highly skilled individual familiar with the platform can be much more beneficial than an inexperienced individual. Because there is a shortage of people with the necessary OutSystems skills, utilizing the platform can become expensive. This makes little sense, considering that a rapid application development platform should be accessible to the average person. However, having a highly skilled individual can greatly increase productivity, making the cost worthwhile."
"Mobile apps should have been fully native."
"The tutorials for the solution should be updated."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"We have performance issues while fetching bulk data."
"There are not enough resources on the market."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"OutSystems does not provide any native reporting resources. All reports must be created with other tools or as a webpage."
More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Development Platforms with 2 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 1st in Mobile Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] writes "Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX).
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.