We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] and Microsoft Azure App Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms."I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."
"I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable."
"The primary and standout feature is ease of deployment."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
"The technical support from Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale the application."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the easy deployment, the scalability, and the Azure maintenance."
"This solution is easy to deploy."
"I'm a decision-maker, not a technician. From my perspective, the most significant advantage is that Azure is a one-stop shop. Everything we needed was included in the Microsoft Agreement. During COVID, it was the most convenient and most straightforward decision."
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution."
"Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."
"The solution needs better integration capabilities on the network side."
"Lacking somewhat in template data flows."
"There is still room for improvement in terms of the maturity of the solution. Everything is available that we need, but the issue is that they are still upgrading. Even though they have Azure applications and automation services, they still need to mature more. There are many things that need to mature and the road map for this is quite long, taking another three to eight years to have a mature solution."
"Can be improved by increasing the number of data centres worldwide."
"Microsoft Azure App Service could improve by having better integration and connectivity with other platforms. The solution has good integration with other large companies' solutions but there are smaller service platforms companies where there could be integrated better."
"The solution is somewhat expensive."
"The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them."
"Having a surplus of tutorials from Microsoft, rather than relying solely on documentation or features from other sources like YouTube, can be beneficial."
More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 4th in Mobile Development Platforms with 38 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] writes "Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Pega BPM and Appian.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.