We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and ElectroNeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its OCR Engine is very successful, and it is the leading OCR Engine. It also has NLP support."
"Identifies and extract relevant elements from a document."
"The most valuable feature of ABBYY FlexiCapture is the accuracy of the general extractions."
"I like the flexibility of the layout. For example, for the documents that we're using, this is the main feature that is very useful and makes it flexible for extraction."
"The solution has its own language that can be configured many ways and with higher accuracy than other products."
"While using ABBYY FlexiCapture we did not use the generic models that they do have for invoice and purchase orders. For one of the use-cases, the document was exactly the purchase order, but we are not using that generic model. We are creating the model from Scratch. However, if I was to compare ABBYY FlexiCapture with other IA tools, the machine learning and how the extraction is done is far better than competitors. This allows a lot less effort for the development."
"We can quickly integrate the catalogs with proper documentation."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to capture data from documents with different formats."
"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."
"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."
"The product's setup is straightforward."
"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."
"The drag and drop feature, which is no code, is very useful for me because I am not a technical person. It is very user-friendly."
"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."
"The accuracy changes depending on the scenario so you need to test it before committing to this solution."
"The integration with UiPath is not good. I would like to see more documentation and guides to help gain more in-depth knowledge of how to use ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"Since we are using a trial version, we don't have administration access to create a tenant to integrate my OCR series with Postman."
"There is an area of improvement. For example, when we read the data from the OCR, the accuracy is not good."
"I would like to see a machine learning model to make the solution more intelligent."
"Could be simplified, particularly the UI."
"Initially, it was good, but now, in terms of ease of implementation and accuracy, there are better competitors in the market. What we are seeing in some of the other tools isn't there in ABBYY. They have to improve it to include such features. Otherwise, it will be difficult for them to compete in the market."
"There is always room for improvement in any product. Some of the configurations for the machine learning models for invoice reading are fairly complicated. There is so much customization that is possible with that sort of thing, so it makes sense that there are a lot of options, but some of the more important ones can be a little better streamlined or more upfront. Currently, machine learning models are a little bit difficult to configure satisfactorily."
"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."
"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."
"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."
"Its price could definitely be lower."
"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."
"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while ElectroNeek is ranked 20th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 9 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while ElectroNeek is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ElectroNeek writes "User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, HyperScience and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas ElectroNeek is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Robocorp and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our ABBYY Vantage vs. ElectroNeek report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors, best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors, and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
