We performed a comparison between 42Gears SureMDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its security is most valuable. It gives us a way to secure devices, not only those that are steady. We do have a few tablets and other devices, and it is a way for us to secure these devices and manage them. We know they're out there and what's their status. We can manage their life cycle and verify that they're updated properly."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"It helps implement conditional access policies to restrict mobile users from accessing potentially dangerous emails."
"It has improve our organization through the remote management of non-domain joined devices."
"Intune provides full visibility into all active mobile device users. If their devices are noncompliant with our security policies, I have the flexibility to update them remotely."
"Stable solution at a good price."
"It's easy to manage and easy to configure."
"Microsoft's cloud comes with a lot of extra features that are free of charge."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Payloads, application publishing, and cataloging features are valuable to our customers."
"The solution's customer support is good."
"This solution is very dynamic. I can do what I need to do with it."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The tool's most valuable feature is a remote connection to the devices. You can also push and lock applications. It helps us lock devices for professional use to control which applications can be installed."
"Its dashboards are valuable. It is easy to access dashboards and implement policies."
"The most valuable features of 42Gears SureMDM include tracking location and pushing applications."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The product works perfectly for patch management and software deployments."
"The stability is very good."
"It's a complete product that allows you to remote troubleshoot, has an inventory of systems."
"The solution is time-saving and resource-saving."
"In terms of technical capability, it is doing very well. It is doing better than other industry products. It is at a place where we can compare it with Microsoft products. Its scalability is also good."
"Honestly, I have to say all features together have become the Swiss army knife of desktop management. They all work hand in hand. Software deployment saves an unbelievable amount of time installing an application on hundreds of computers."
"Its cross-platform capabilities and the ability to do both OS-level patching and third-party patching are valuable. It is difficult to find a software product that will do all that for you out of the box, and you don't have to do any configuration other than your initial setup. Once you do that, there is a very minimalistic approach to getting it operational. You can have it up and running within a 20-minute time span."
"The Mac integration has room for improvement."
"Sometimes, customers compare it with AirWatch, but the concept of Intune is different from other solutions. It's an application management app. It gets a bit difficult to explain it to customers, but it's not a product limitation. It takes a presale document or presentation to explain it to customers."
"The scalability could be improved, and like most other MDM products, Intune is good but not 100% there yet."
"They could also make it easier to use because there are some other products that may be easier to use in terms of the look and feel of the dashboard."
"Once it's configured it is unobtrusive, but it does take some hands-on to configure and deploy it properly."
"I have a lot of Apple products in my environment. It would be nice to have an improved integration of Apple products with Microsoft Intune without Jam."
"We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks."
"Microsoft Intune could improve by being more user-friendly and having it geared toward device management. The graphic interface is not very good."
"User creation on Mac must be improved."
"The user interface and customization features are not the best and could be improved."
"The product is not so convenient to deploy or to configure."
"The dashboards could be improved."
"The solution’s pricing could be made cheaper."
"As a partner, we consider 42Gears to be a unified endpoint management (UEM) solution. So, we should be able to manage users with this particular solution. This is something that is currently not there. It is probably an area for improvement for 42Gears."
"42Gears SureMDM needs to improve support because it may take around one to two days to receive a revert."
"The team I've currently got is not using it particularly well, due to the fact that they don't know how to use it particularly well. They've not done any training and so on."
"The MDM feature isn't very good. It doesn't support Amazon vendors."
"Its licensing should be improved."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central should keep up with some of the features that other major vendors are providing, such as Microsoft."
"The solution should be better at integrating with other solutions."
"The tool's security can be better."
"Desktop Central has very good information, however, you can't customize the dashboards."
"There is a slight delay in customer support, which is something that can be improved."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
42Gears SureMDM is ranked 14th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 8 reviews while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 4th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 59 reviews. 42Gears SureMDM is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of 42Gears SureMDM writes "Allows you to secure, monitor and manage company-owned devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". 42Gears SureMDM is most compared with SOTI MobiControl, VMware Workspace ONE, IBM MaaS360, Hexnode UEM and Jamf Pro, whereas ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl. See our 42Gears SureMDM vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central report.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.