IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

BMC Remedyforce [EOL] OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Buyer's Guide

Download the Help Desk Software Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: June 2022

What is BMC Remedyforce [EOL]?

BMC Remedyforce, built on Salesforce App Cloud, enables you to deliver high-speed service management that empowers users and accelerates the business, with minimal capital investment.

Built with speed and flexibility in mind

  • Comprehensive functionality:Incident, problem, change, service level management, self-service, discovery and asset management
  • Social, mobile, modern access: With the Salesforce 1 platform, solve incidents, submit approvals, and crowdsource information via Chatter or chat
  • Intuitive dashboards and reporting: Resolve 90% of IT issues on the first call; show key business metrics in real time
  • Configuration not customization: Deploy new technologies and services without coding or scripting, using existing Salesforce staff
  • No software or hardware to install or manage: Seamless upgrades twice a year with simple, value-based pricing


BMC Remedyforce [EOL] was previously known as Remedyforce.

BMC Remedyforce [EOL] Customers

Design Within Reach, Dex Media, DHHS, News UK, Pervasive Software, Mitchell International, Sysmex Corporation, Ameritas, Lumen 21

BMC Remedyforce [EOL] Video

Archived BMC Remedyforce [EOL] Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good integrations and very stable with excellent alert functionality
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is very good at integrating systems."
  • "It's hard to find information about the solution online. We'll sometimes use the internet to look for technical answers, and we won't be able to find it."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution to record IT events and instances. For example, if someone is working within the office but suddenly their test op doesn't work, they'll call the IT service support desk and the desk will take the call and record the instance on the Remedy system.  We'll also use this system to record and send out notifications to all related staff so that they know about the status of relevant activities and tasks. 

What is most valuable?

The solution is very good at integrating systems. The solution is very stable.  There are good alarm systems in place. When something goes wrong, or some switch has a problem, Remedyforce can recognize it and send alerts to the operator.

What needs improvement?

The monitoring system could be improved. It would be helpful if the solution was more open-source so that there is more community content available. It's hard to find information about the solution online. We'll sometimes use the internet to look for technical answers, and we won't be able to find it. The solution is quite complex, and because of this, you need assistance from BMC for implementation and often for troubleshooting as well. We don't like this kind of situation. We want to be able to know how to use the solution completely and handle everything in-house. However, you tend to have to rely on BMC. Only they know the details of the product. The solution shouldn't just cater to IT departments. We also use it with HR and it would be helpful if the solution offered a few more HR-focused features.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for a decade. It's been about ten years.
Buyer's Guide
Help Desk Software
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Atlassian and others in Help Desk Software. Updated: June 2022.
610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is a very stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution isn't scalable.

How are customer service and support?

We've been in touch with technical support and the team is awesome. They are very good to work with. We've been quite satisfied with the level of support we get.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before joining this company, I used an HP product, but I do not recall the name of it. Compared with HP, BMC is much better.

How was the initial setup?

I believe the solution's initial setup is complex. I joined the company 13 years ago, and the system already existed, so I didn't handle the initial setup. However, the system has a lot of customizable functions, so it's not plug and play. It can get quite complex because a lot of items need to be customized before deploying the solution. The deployment will take a couple of days at least.

What about the implementation team?

An organization looking to implement the solution will definitely require the help of either BMC or a BMC partner. In our organization, it's very helpful to have assistance as we are not as skilled. A consultant engineer or analytical engineer that comes from BMC will have certifications. They know the system very well and it takes knowledge to deploy everything correctly. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing model is complex. For example, some parts are based on the company (how many people use it) and some parts are based on the service model. It differs.

What other advice do I have?

We have around 500 people in our company and at least half of them will come in contact with this software daily. I don't think too many people are very familiar with it, however, because it has to be updated continually to accommodate some new functions. I'd advise other companies that the product is very powerful, and if they want to keep their old servers, they should be careful. It's a big software system and it's not very open. They won't be able to find too much information about it on the internet and will have to rely on BMC directly quite a bit. The solution is highly customizable, however, meaning it will quite easily fit into almost any company's requirements. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Business analyst / Consultant at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Stable, but needs to be faster and more responsive
Pros and Cons
  • "If a company needs to expand the solution, they are able to do so. It is quite scalable."
  • "It's not user-friendly. Everything is overly complicated. Even for the simplest of tasks, a user will waste time. It requires a lot of clicks and a lot of steps. Often we will have to do the same thing two or three times. It's really bad."

What is our primary use case?

I primarily use asset management, the console parcel, and the CMDB functionalities. It's mainly for search and to verify access. I also use it to update attributes and relationships.

Currently, we are mainly using it for the change management process, for example, for planning and bringing forth approval process changes (that are open and assigned to our team). 

Occasionally it is also used for incident management.

What is most valuable?

I can't think of a single feature I like on the solution.

What needs improvement?

I don't like the product at all.

It's not user-friendly. Everything is overly complicated. Even for the simplest of tasks, a user will waste time. It requires a lot of clicks and a lot of steps. Often we will have to do the same thing two or three times. It's really bad.

The solution needs a mobile interface.

It should be able to work faster and be more responsive. Right now it's clunky and slow. It takes ages and because of the lack of speed, it can get really annoying to use.

It would be helpful if the solution offered features related to asset management on the financial side. They need some functionality that would allow the company to calculate the total cost of ownership of a state. There should be some sort of license management functionality in order to manage their land and the life cycle easily. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for three and a half to four years so far.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. I haven't experienced any bugs or glitches and I haven't heard of any complaints from the client in this regard.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

If a company needs to expand the solution, they are able to do so. It is quite scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

I've been in touch with technical support in the past. 

I'm told because I'm a consultant, that they need to talk to the customer. I would expect, however, if I pose a question and ask for support, that it would be beneficial to them to try to figure out what I'm asking, Instead, there's a lot of back and forth. They end up coming to me 10 times in order to get the exact same question they want to be answered. 

They are not as supportive or as quick as they should be. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I don't have any experience working with a different solution.

How was the initial setup?

I didn't handle the initial setup, so I can't speak to the process and I don't know if it was straightforward or complex.

What other advice do I have?

I don't really know what deployment model is used within the organization as I'm not an employee of the company that uses BMC. I work there as a consultant. I don't really know the details about the architecture.

I would advise other companies to take the time to make sure this product is really going to help them. Otherwise, they might be stuck with it and it isn't going to work well.

I'd rate the solution six out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Help Desk Software
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Atlassian and others in Help Desk Software. Updated: June 2022.
610,518 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Adnan Naseem - PeerSpot reviewer
Jr Software Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Consultant
Good knowledge base and ticketing system but technical support needs improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "The knowledge base is the solution's most valuable aspect. All of the knowledge we need is right at our fingertips."
  • "The solution's technical support is in need of a lot of improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the product for our banking solution. I use it as a way for customers to open their tickets and resolve problems that are related to their banking, both internal and external.

What is most valuable?

The knowledge base is the solution's most valuable aspect. All of the knowledge we need is right at our fingertips.

The solution offers the best ticketing incident regiment as well.

What needs improvement?

The solution's technical support is in need of a lot of improvement.

The pricing of the solution is quite high. It would be ideal if they could adjust it to make it more affordable. The fees on our management engine, in particular, are high.

The solution needs to have more documentation.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've only been using the solution for about five months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Although the solution is still quite new for me, I have noticed that it contains a few glitches and bugs, so I wouldn't say it is 100% stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I've found the solution to be scalable. I don't think an organization would have trouble scaling.

There are two or three other people using the solution in my organization, so there are three companies that currently use Remedyforce.

How are customer service and technical support?

We've dealt with technical support in the past and have not been satisfied with the level of service that was provided to us.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup isn't straightforward or complex. It's quite ordinary. it's what you would expect.

I can't recall how long it took to install the solution or deploy it. I believe it took a couple of weeks. We spent a lot of time with some on-premises work.

What about the implementation team?

We used a supporting consultant that helped us implement the solution at our organization.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is costly. I'm not sure of the exact costs, however. I'm sure that the solution is more expensive than competitors such as ManageEngine.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I'm unsure if we evaluated another solution before choosing this one.

What other advice do I have?

I'd warn others that when it comes to implementing Remedyforce, they should be aware there may be fees involved.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. If they had better documentation and better technical support, I would rate them higher.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Service Assurance Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good interface, good customization, and very stable
Pros and Cons
  • "The interface and customization are the solution's most valuable features."
  • "The solution's business workforce should be much more capable of drag and drop functionality. The solution could be kind-of UI based rather than still being coding based. You still need an administrator profile, and you'll have to code things if you want to use the solution."

What is most valuable?

The interface and customization are the solution's most valuable features.

What needs improvement?

The solution's business workforce should be much more capable of drag and drop functionality. The solution could be kind-of UI based rather than still being coding based. You still need an administrator profile, and you'll have to code things if you want to use the solution.

The solution should introduce more AI and more automation. It would be an overall benefit to the product as a whole.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for the past three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. Right now, the solution is quite customized. Upgrading will take a bit of planning on our part.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability because of our own existing infrastructure and our own unique support model, it's bit difficult. It's a challenge we're facing currently. Right now, we're wondering if we should continue with this solution or move over to ServiceNow, which may make scalability easier for us. ServiceNow is on the cloud. We're looking at options and whether we need to move onto the Helix platform before moving everything into BMC ITS and then migrate back and move all of the integrations to Diago.

Currently, we have in the ballpark of 5,000 users.

How are customer service and technical support?

We've been satisfied with technical support. We haven't come across any bottlenecks in the service provided. 

How was the initial setup?

The solution was a bit complex to set up. For us, we needed a legacy tool integration. It was not about the tool itself. Since we hold a legacy system, we have to manage it and getting integrated with those legacy systems was a major coup for us. It still took us a long time to integrate everything. We had more than 20 in all, in terms of legacy systems. We wanted to integrate all of these into one platform, and the ticketing platform was BMC Remedy.

What about the implementation team?

We had a partner that assisted us with the implementation.

What other advice do I have?

I am an internal auditor, so I cannot reveal much information in terms of my current organization's structure.

I'd strongly recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
OS3 Product Development Lead at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Real User
A stable application developed for telecommunications companies
Pros and Cons
  • "It's a stable solution."
  • "They need to include more high-end technology, different languages, the kinds of things not yet included in the product."

What is our primary use case?

Since it's a built application based on Remedy, we use it for Telcos. It's an application developed for telecommunications companies.

What needs improvement?

They're only just beginning to use less API now on version 19.08, and they need to include more high-end technology, different languages, the kinds of things they haven't yet included in the product that could improve it. 

Additional features they could include would be to improve the content with better technologies, higher-end technologies, that kind of thing. The interface could be improved, I'd want the developers to work on that as it would allow more flexibility.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable. 

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer support is fine. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost is quite high but since they are one of the big four companies for this type of development platform, I think the price is okay. But I'm not the right person to talk because I'm not a CEO.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this product an eight out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Abdullah_Smadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Unit Manager at Magnoos Information Systems
Real User
A solid, reasonably-priced service management solution for small to mid-sized businesses
Pros and Cons
  • "An inexpensive solution that is easy to set up and use without much support."
  • "The product is created to service small to medium-sized businesses. Although it can be used in enterprise settings this choice comes down to properly assessing needs."

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case for Remedyforce is for clients who do not have a requirement on the CMDB (Configuration Management Database). When I'm talking about a requirement, I'm talking about things like federation and reconciliation requirements. This gap is one of the reasons I started looking at Remedyforce as a potential solution. 

The second reason for choosing this is when the client size is medium to small — not truly enterprise. Medium-sized companies in my view means that the support staff is around 10 to 30 members. That is just the number of support staff, not end-users. There should also be about 50 to 100 servers.

A third component is when there are no critical integrations — we call them huge integrations. There are two kinds of integration. First, there is very straightforward integration where I need to connect to an active directory and, for example, read the people detail. The second is more complicated integrations. For example, a client might ask to do provisioning on the active directory, or they may want to do updates like bidirectional integration. Remedyforce is not built for this type of thing. The product as of yet was not built to handle complex requirements. When it comes to complex requirements, we have to be honest with the client. It is as if they buy a cheaper car and try to make it into a Ferrari. We have other remedies for this situation, Helix Remedy. It is a Ferrari. Remedyforce is not the Ferrari.

What is most valuable?

There are several excellent features that I find valuable in the product. The self-service portal, knowledge management, and the CMDB from the last version are the best of these. Previously CMDB was the worst feature. Now they improved it significantly and it is one of the best features of the product.

Other modules that older versions of the product had are not really featured but can be useful. For example incident management. I cannot tell you that incident management in Remedyforce is as good a feature as incident management in Micro Focus — which has different incident management capabilities. They are both valuable incident management products depending on needs and expectations.

What needs improvement?

Of course, there are features that can be added, improved and enhanced in any product. I would like to see the CMDB feature include federation in the consideration engine. That would be the number one enhancement I would like. Number two, enhance the change management module by including a calendar. They should also create and include an impact analysis engine. They don't have an impact analysis engine right now.

But if you notice these features like change management are more related to big organizations. BMC wants to keep it this way. BMC has trillions of dollars they could put into research and development to add features. They envision Remedyforce for medium to small companies and it is their market. Our Ferrari product is for large, enterprise organizations. So, if they enhance the change management in Remedyforce, they will be making the products similar to other products. Eventually, the client will wonder why they are offering the same product with more than one name. It would be like basically having the same product but for cheaper pricing. It doesn't make sense.

They want to offer different products and enhance some type of distinguishing advantage of each. They want products to appeal to different market segments because they want to capture all of the marketplaces. It is as simple as this.

For how long have I used the solution?

It has been two years that we are using this product.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This product is really stable. It has an uptime of 99.9%. They also have great customer service policies to cover any stability issue. In case the system goes down for any reason, BMC is willing to cover any lapse in service during the subscription. They will actually cover the exact amount of time for you. After your subscription ends, they will calculate the days and they will refund it directly to you.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a scalable product. Because it is on the cloud, lots of people can connect to it and there is no problem with growing the number of connections. If you want, you can even add a mobile app now. Previously they didn't have a mobile app option.

Remedyforce's scalability has some limitations and because of that, it is not going to fit in most large enterprises. However, very large companies are using the product with success. For example, Carrefour is a very large grocery chain something like Walmart and they are using Remedyforce.

There are reasons to use Remedyforce and it is okay for big clients. One of our big clients is the Al Tayer Group. They are a dealership for expensive luxury cars like Range Rover, Ford, and Ferrari (the real Ferrari). The number of actual users is small, but the amount of business they do is huge.

I have a meeting, a new project coming up with Al Ghurair Group. Retail groups love this product because it is very fast but not expensive. Forpen is another big enterprise and they are using Remedyforce heavily. They are treating it as a large enterprise solution. The product works for them for now because they did many things on top of it to make it work. Really they are paying more than what it deserves to put into it. Sometimes you might own a Toyota Corolla and you keep enhancing it to try to make it work like a Ferrari. Actually you are wasting your time and resources on it because the solution you need already exists. Go buy the other one you want because it is better for you. It may feel harder to switch than it actually is.

Can you scale it? Yes. But doing it may not be a good business decision. There comes a point where there is no point in enhancing the product more. For some of the clients in the UAE, change is hard for them. They think that they already have a solution that they know how to use and they are happy with it. They think it's a headache to change and switch and get used to something else. It is also not always easy to go to procurement to finance a change. You need to justify why you need to change a product and defend the expense.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer and technical support are very good. Their response to issues and the resolutions are the fastest across all of our cloud competitors. They are the leader in customer support being both very fast and on the spot. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I'm the BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) business unit manager in my company. I know every little thing about my competitors and their products in order to have success selling products.

Earlier we were not relying on Remedyforce but BMC recently made a significant investment in Remedyforce. The name is changed and it is called BMC Helix Remedyforce. It is built on the Salesforce Platform, which is a well-established cloud platform. Recently, they decided to provide more features. It has now chatbots. They provide BMC discovery for the cloud as well. These two features were always available in BMC but it was only for Remedy IT service management — the enterprise solution. Now they make them available to be integrated to work with Remedyforce which makes Remedyforce a very strong solution. 

How was the initial setup?

The product is only available in the cloud, so there is no setup. You just place an order and you'll get it tomorrow. Everyone now is moving to the cloud here in UAE. The first data center for Azure is in Abu Dhabi. That is because it is a better means of deployment.

What about the implementation team?

Because there is no installation process, there is no need for a consultant or anybody to help.

The configuration is a little different and it could take some time. You'll have the system up and running but you need to put efforts to configure it. Tasks would include uploading the people details, building service requests, building templates, etcetera. However, almost all of these tasks are very simple and very easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This product is very inexpensive. It is subscription-based on yearly contracts.

My current company has a deal. I think the subscription per year is 20K dollars. Per year for the client is really nothing compared to other products and solutions. You know that a five years subscription is one hundred thousand dollars for five years using all this functionality.

What other advice do I have?

On the cloud, BMC is a leader. Even now they are introducing AI as part of their platform. Any platform that you have in the cloud with them, you'll have IBM Watson built-in with it. The chatbot used in Remedyforce is AI-based using IBM Watson.

If someone is considering Remedyforce they need to ask the right questions of themselves. Very simple, straightforward questions. How many servers do you have? How many support staff you have? How many custom processes do you have? Or are you a green field where you have not begun to build anything? These things will help to define the correct solution. If this is not fit for you do to the answers you give and the discovery of the product. My recommendation might be to go to Helix Remedy. It depends if that will help you have success with your needs for the solution. Helix Remedy is great for large enterprises. The product has many complex solutions. However, it is also not right for everyone.

Let me tell you about one of our customers, Dubai Financial Markets. The Dubai Financial Market has millions there. The number of support staff is small. You would be surprised. The number of end-users is only 200, the number for the support staff around 30. But in this case, Remedyforce will fail there. They have Helix Remedy because they have very complicated processes. For example, Remedyforce does not have something called the process designer. Helix Remedy has an engine called the process designer to build any kind of custom IP process. It was a small staff, but they needed more advanced solutions.

If you want more help in making decisions you can go to BMC blogs and forums and discover more about products. This can also help you to identify features you may not know exist that would be useful.

On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I think BMC Remedyforce is an eight. Every software has limitations. If you ask me about Helix Remedy, I will tell you a nine, there's nothing like ten, nothing.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
it_user794739 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
User
Efficient in calculating the performance of services provided

What is our primary use case?

We are using BMC Remedyforce for IT, as well as for the HR service desk of our company for the last two years, effectively.

How has it helped my organization?

ITIL best practices and smart practices are efficient in calculating the performance of services provided. 

What is most valuable?

  • Incident management
  • Change management
  • Service request management
  • CMDB
  • Configuration management
  • Dashboards
  • Analytics
  • Chat

What needs improvement?

  • There should be filtered criteria, like workflow rules, in service request conditions.
  • There should be some tool to move SRD and SLA from the sandbox to production.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
it_user788007 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
User
Offers good reporting capabilities. Getting the right information is the key to understanding.
Pros and Cons
  • "Offers good reporting capabilities. Getting the right information is the key to understanding and improvements."
  • "Remedyforce replaced all our legacy applications globally. This enabled us to move tickets and requests to other regions easily."
  • "​Improve the out-of-the-box ITIL compliance, which would be great for new customers."
  • "More flexible ways to change the existing configuration would benefit existing customers."
  • "It required a high amount of customisation for us to work with the tool and sometimes special capabilities needed to be purchased."
  • "As we added more custom configuration, we started running into SOQL errors, which could not be resolved yet."

What is our primary use case?

How has it helped my organization?

Remedyforce replaced all our legacy applications globally. This enabled us to move tickets and requests to other regions easily.

What is most valuable?

Remedyforce offers good reporting capabilities. Getting the right information is the key to understanding and improvements.

What needs improvement?

  • Improve the out-of-the-box ITIL compliance, which would be great for new customers.
  • More flexible ways to change the existing configuration would benefit existing customers.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

As we added more custom configuration, we started running into SOQL errors, which could not be resolved yet.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We migrated various solution to Remedyforce for the purpose of standardization.

What about the implementation team?

We used several vendors. Not all their solutions were developed to be future proof.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It required a high amount of customisation for us to work with the tool and sometimes special capabilities needed to be purchased.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

This information is not available to me.

What other advice do I have?

Remedyforce is a good tool, but lacks out-ot-the-box functionalities. Planning ahead can save a lot of money and effort.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Technology Process Analyst at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Real User
It has quickly become our go-to for managing all documentation related to IPCM
Pros and Cons
  • "The record linking shows us all of the changes that were implemented during that release, what clients were affected, related incidents and problem records, and important documentation that occurred along the way."
  • "The setup was somewhat complex as it seemed there were three ways to do the same thing."

What is our primary use case?

BMC Remedyforce is our incident/problem/change management system which manages all client reported issues full circle from the first call incident reporting, managing identified problems, and tracking and approval for all changes going into our production systems. We also use Remedyforce Self Service as our primary (internal) support ticketing system.

How has it helped my organization?

Prior to Remedyforce, our company did not have a software package to manage all items related to issues and changes happening in our production environments. Along with a new Change Management Policy, Remedyforce quickly became our go-to for managing all documentation related to IPCM.

What is most valuable?

There are many advantages that we have found with Remedyforce, one of which is the record linking functionality. This allows us to look back at (for example) a previous release of our software to view everything that happened during that release. The record linking shows us all of the changes that were implemented during that release, what clients were affected, related incidents and problem records, and important documentation that occurred along the way.

What needs improvement?

In the background, there are limitations with what the automation can/cannot do (i.e., flows will error after looping through a 100 records). With a complex system that contains sometimes 100s of linking records, this causes issues with current workflows that we wish were not limited.  

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No.  

How was the initial setup?

Personally, I thought the setup was somewhat complex. That may be due to our company's various workflows that we needed to take into consideration, but it seems that between *Flows *Process Builder and *Validation Rules", they were tough for us to wrap our heads around as it seemed there were three ways to do the same thing.  

What about the implementation team?

Both. We had a consultant work with our project team on the build and implementation. Our in-house expert knew more than our consultant did, which got to be very frustrating when the consultant would not listen to our suggestions (he didn't listen very well).

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

BMC Remedyforce is extremely reasonable when talking about licensing costs.  For an entire IPCM system and Self Service ticketing system, you can't get much better.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

If our company did, I was not employed here at that time.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
RemedyForce Administrator at a retailer
Real User
Remedyforce has greatly improved our company's ability to accurately track and create new records
Pros and Cons
  • "Remedyforce has greatly improved our company's ability to accurately track and create new records."
  • "Our staff is able to quickly jump into Remedyforce and understand the tool with minimal training."

    What is our primary use case?

    Remedyforce is our company's incident, change, problem, and release management platform. 

    How has it helped my organization?

    Remedyforce has greatly improved our company's ability to accurately track and create new records. Incidents can be opened in the console, through email, and from the Self Service Portal. 

    What is most valuable?

    The console offers a clean UI for managing records and maintaining a history for each record. We find our staff is able to quickly jump into Remedyforce and understand the tool with minimal training. 

    What needs improvement?

    The tool is not missing any major features. A customer could benefit from additional Service Portal development.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    Three to five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    No issues. Uptime is very strong.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    No issues.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Our company had previously used BMC Remedy 7, and it had became very outdated. It was also unfriendly to customize. 

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The cost may be higher, but it is backed up by the great product and superb customer service. Licensing should be reviewed and understood before making the purchase.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We looked at the latest version of on-premise Remedy

    What other advice do I have?

    Make sure BMC Remedyforce offers what you are looking for, and if it does, I highly recommend it to companies looking for a great ITSM tool. 

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.