Share your experience using Panther

I use it for developing scripts - UI scripts and API tests. 

We use it for both API testing and UI testing. It's been okay. Apica claims to have expertise similar to LoadRunner, and we were interested in trying it. 

Overall, it's functional, and we get good support from the Apica team since it's a newer product. 

I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps.

Moreover, it is easy to set up and configure tests in Apica.  I really like how it presents the results in a sheet format. That's very helpful.

It's not very user-friendly.

There are more areas of improvement as well. We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections. 

Also, with correlation, there are times we can't correlate values in the header, and that would be a helpful improvement.

I have been using it for more than one and a half year. 

It doesn't crash. So, for me, the stability is good. 

Scalability is not bad. We have more than 20 end users using it in my company. 

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. 

The customer service and support are really helpful. 

Positive

I used LoadRunner and JMeter. 

The initial setup is easy. 

It is not a famous product, and it still needs to be worked on. JMeter is the best tool in this space. Like for API testing. 

Overall, I would rate Apica a seven out of ten. 

We use Coralogix to analyze our log metrics. We were looking for an enhanced tool to help us secure our real-time data.

We have integrated Coralogix with Slack and other tools, which has helped us receive real-time alerts. We don't have to constantly monitor the tool because it generates alerts and pushes them to us, providing notifications on Slack. This enhancement has strengthened our security, fulfilling our need when searching for such a tool. 

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams. This SaaS platform utilizes machine learning for behavioral analysis of logs, yielding the results we need. For instance, there was a scenario where we received extension logs that were difficult to interpret. However, we obtained the analysis with the help of the product.

Almost all the features we currently use in our product subscription are important to us. Regarding alerting or incident management, incident alert mapping, and suppression rules, we utilize almost all the features available on Coralogix. Additionally, we are sending all the logs, such as app logs, EPC flow logs, etcetera.

Nowadays, tools are often divided into modules. It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription. It would streamline the process for organizations like ours.

Merging some of the modules into a single subscription would be beneficial. Nowadays, modules are often separated, so if an organization needs additional modules after subscribing to one, they may have to purchase another subscription. Combining the availability module with tracing metrics or other relevant modules would be beneficial.

I rate the platform's stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the platform's scalability an eight.

We did contact the technical support team when we encountered a deployment issue with Cloudflare. They assisted us promptly and provided helpful answers within the expected time frame.

Before adopting Coralogix, we relied on open-source solutions, but they needed to meet our needs effectively. It led us to explore and eventually invest in a commercial product.

The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten.

We also evaluated Palo Alto and other Palo Alto products as potential solutions. We opted for Coralogix over Palo Alto because its subscription plan offered better visibility and more features.

The alerting feature in Coralogix, integrated with Slack, has helped your team respond to incidents more quickly and effectively. We haven't experienced any incidents since implementation. Still, during the POC phase, the alerting feature proved to be prompt and reliable, assisting your team in promptly addressing potential issues.

It provides visualization tools that facilitate data analysis. These tools are available directly on the dashboard.

I recommend analyzing their organization's use case and scenario for new users. They should compare it with other tools to see if it suits their needs. If they find it suitable, then they should proceed with it. However, they should be prepared for the possibility that the tool may only suit some organizations. In our case, it worked well in pricing, scenario, and overall performance, so we opted to use it.


I rate it a nine out of ten.