Share your experience using Pantheon

I use the solution to create an upstream and to create multiple sites from that upstream.

The product allows users to create multiple development environments. I'm satisfied with the performance and the user-friendliness of the solution. Our clients are also happy. Hosting Drupal is very good in Pantheon.

The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP.

I have been using the solution for two to three years.

I rate the product’s stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability an eight out of ten. Four or five people in my organization use the solution for development purposes. We also use the product for many clients, including government entities. We develop upstream and deploy it using Pantheon.

There was an upgrade in the solution. After that, we faced some issues, but the support team helped us very much. We are satisfied with the support.

Positive

We are using AWS and Drupal, an open-source product.

The initial setup is easy. We can set it up very easily. The deployment takes 30 minutes to an hour.

Most clients prefer other custom servers because of Pantheon’s high cost.

We are a software development company. We recommend solutions to our clients, but they ask us to compare it with other solutions. Clients compare the monthly costs of Pantheon with other servers and ask us to create the same environment in dedicated servers. If Pantheon reduces its cost, we can confidently suggest it to clients. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

We use Pantheon for manufacturing business processes, including transactions, financial models, etc.

Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model. It helps us to adapt to the system based on business requirements. 

Pantheon's design is not familiar to use. It could be more user-friendly.

We have been using Pantheon for eight years. At present, we are using the latest version.

I rate Pantheon's stability an eight out of ten. There is room for improvement.

It is a very scalable system. Its speed never drops, even if multiple users work on it simultaneously.

The initial setup process is complicated for users to execute. It requires an IT executive for installation.

The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems.

I advise others to reserve a month to learn and adapt to the system. I rate it an eight out of ten.