We use the tracing service from Coralogix mainly to store logs.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
We use the tracing service from Coralogix mainly to store logs.
The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces.
The documentation of the tool could be improved. The amount of data the system can process at one time is not that high. In a future release, it would be great to have an easier way to manipulate data that has already been ingested. It could also be more user-friendly.
I have been using this solution for a year and a half.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for stability.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for customer support.
Positive
The initial setup is easy and only took a couple of hours.
The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested.
Coralogix is an Israeli startup so the headquarters of the company is in Israel. I believe it was easier for our company to find a company in Israel.
If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that.
I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion.
Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.
Our primary use case for the solution is pushing logs so we can find the log there or provide it as a self-service to the developers, and developers can see logs and what's going on. So mostly the standard debugging use case.
The ability to view is valuable. We can view the logs that are currently available for a few days.
The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory. Additionally, more advanced functionalities can be included in the next release.
We have been using the solution for approximately one year and are currently using the cloud version.
The solution is stable.
The solution is not scalable because it is very expensive if you scale it up too much. Hence, it is very limiting to use. Currently, 25 people in our organization are using the solution.
We do not have experience with customer service and support.
The initial setup is straightforward.
The pricing depends on our requirements. If you're going to use the bare minimum, then the pricing is quite cheap and is a good start for many companies. However, if you're going to do it full-scale and have 30 months of data, then the solution may not be the best fit.
I rate the solution a six out of ten. The solution is good, but the user interface can be improved. The solution is easy to use and to start with, but it does not measure up to the more complex things.