HPE 3PAR StoreServ is an enterprise storage that is mainly deployed in enterprise scenarios like banking and insurance.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is an enterprise storage that is mainly deployed in enterprise scenarios like banking and insurance.
The solution’s stability could be improved.
I rate HPE 3PAR StoreServ an eight out of ten for stability.
Around 20 customers use the solution extensively in their companies.
I rate HPE 3PAR StoreServ a seven out of ten for scalability.
The initial setup is straightforward if it is a single server. If there are multiple servers, the initial setup becomes complex.
A single server takes an hour to be deployed.
The solution has two parts: software and hardware, and you need to buy licenses for some features.
One admin is enough to maintain the solution if it is single storage. A complex environment with a heavy workload will need more people to maintain the solution.
I would recommend HPE 3PAR StoreServ to users based on their use cases.
Overall, I rate HPE 3PAR StoreServ a seven out of ten.
I use it for data consolidation management tasks, and we'll go through the control apps. I go to the controller to do that.
Moreover, Hitachi VSP streamlined our data access and storage processes. So, it's got NFS and CIFS. And the CFIS, too, depends on the disk type we put in, it can format files and data for different protocols like SMB.So it's versatile in its own ways.
We use it in conjunction with the cloud. So it's multi-tenant, making sure that it is cloud-ready. This is cloud-ready hardware and software. And, the VSPs have the capacity to integrate other third-party software and the engine is very, very powerful.
The deployment could be a bit easier, because it's a bit tricky.
I have been using it for more than a year now.
When I look at storage, it's about uptime, disaster recovery, and all those things.
So, its reliability has been crucial to our operations.
I haven't had any issues with the stability of the product.
Normal issues, as we go through patch management, make sure that we do not install anything without looking at the bug scrubbing and all that stuff, and ensure that we always have a stable platform. Do our research and in the background, talk to Hitachi and not take it just by ourselves.
It's a multi-tenanted model, a monthly tenant, it's not just one organization we're hosting. But depending on the customer, we just bring on a tenant.
It's modular. So I can keep growing. But, again, every modular thing also has its limitations. For example, if I take an E590 series, it can grow so much because the engines can support and handle so much, then you gotta go up to the higher one.
What I haven't seen is if the E590 is compatible with the next level up, if they are interoperable, or if they have to be treated as a separate cluster. I am not sure about that yet.
The customer service and support are reasonably good. The environment I work in, there always remains an element of surprise, and there are restrictions.
But Hitachi has good technical people. The customer account manager is good and gets the thing straightaway.
The setup is in three parts. One is the field setup, with someone coming in to do the initial configuration, which would have an IP address, and work away from it.
Followed by the Professional Service setup, which is architecture and design. It's a very versatile box, so that setup is very tricky. We have to get it right the first time.
If you make a mistake and don't design or architect the platform correctly, you're going to have to unwind, which can be done with the help of snapshots.
With the vCenter, you control these things, and in this case, the controller. And you take a snapshot and put it on another box.
So it could be easier to deploy.
Architecture-wise, it's actually at a competitive price point. It is not cheap. But for the purpose-built, and one thing I've never seen, which is probably an industry thing, is that it's modular to start with, but it has to be the same model and make for it to grow.
Every business is different. Like, when I was using the Dell EMC PowerStore 1000 (not Dell 1000P), the cost analysis for that specific business is different from what I'm doing now. So, it depends on if I'm comparing apples to apples, and in this case, it's not. It's apples to oranges.
We did consider the cost when we were sizing Hitachi against another product. But ultimately, it came down to more than just the price. You need to look at the technology, the engineers available for DevOps support, and what kind of engineers you can find in the market. Are they more familiar with NetApp or Hitachi?
So, while buying the hardware and software itself might not be the most expensive part, the ongoing cost of maintenance and hiring qualified labor can be significant. If you just look at the upfront cost of hardware and software, maybe there are other products that are a bit cheaper.
But then there might not be enough qualified engineers. And not enough certified engineers for those other products.
If we had to train people and get them up to a higher standard of certification, the time investment for the company or organization would have been much higher. So, from a one-time cost perspective, maybe there were other products that were cheaper upfront. But in this case, considering the ongoing labor costs, Hitachi ended up being a more cost-effective option.
A good part is it is scalable. It's reliable. It is both at all. But it does not work well with BusyBox. Even though it supports multiple vendors, some features do not support multiple tenants; they are not vendor-adopting.
For example, bring in a NetApp and try to use it with Hitachi. You'll either have limitations with that application or you'll actually always have to do extra patching. Or the other tricky part that needs to happen.
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.