We use the solution for network management. It provides a management layer for 200 locations. We have EdgeConnect to control with parameters, etc.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
We use the solution for network management. It provides a management layer for 200 locations. We have EdgeConnect to control with parameters, etc.
The important feature is the insight page. This is in a part of the management website where we have all the statistics about the net condition with a perimeter in one place, giving me enough information about the current status of the network.
The network intelligence could be improved. It provides valuable insights. This network intelligence is important to get more information. There could be more improvement in module issue tests and Internet connectivity.
I have been using Aruba EdgeConnect for three years.
The product is stable.
I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.
The scalability depends on the skills. There are a few network administrators with over 260 locations. In every location, we have 100 people. We have over 26,000 users using this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.
We have contacted customer service multiple times, including the Falcon partner. They were willing to help and support us.
Positive
Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform can be compared with VeloCloud, VMware, and Meraki from Cisco. Based on my comparison, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is better in terms of look and feel.
The initial setup is simple. Companies buy it because it's simple to set up and configure.
The platform's pricing is not low and not high. It's affordable for enterprise and mid-sized businesses.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We use the Aruba platform for connectivity for our enterprise to run our business operations.
The platform is very user-friendly. It allows clients to manage their network and view bandwidth, application performance, and application bandwidth usage across all locations. The platform's many features made it easy for us to transition from SD-WAN.
There were issues, but now it is improving.
I have been using Aruba for four years.
The product is stable. There were issues related to box management, but it is now stabilized.
The solution is scalable and suitable for enterprise-level business.
We initially faced challenges with the platform in 2018 and 2019. The underlying GNS technology was relatively new and not fully equipped to handle the complexities of our environment. However, the platform has been steadily improving. They have resolved over 50% of the reported bugs, and the platform is becoming more stable and reliable. Initially, we were operating with a single network feed, which presented many challenges.
Positive
The initial setup is straightforward, requiring two engineers for onsite and remote each. The deployment typically takes less than an hour. However, installing Cisco ENC devices, such as the 5403 or 5400, can be more challenging and require additional troubleshooting.
The solution is easy to maintain.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
