User Reviews of IBM Security Secret Server & Symantec Privileged Access Manager

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing IBM Security Secret Server and Symantec Privileged Access Manager based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






IBM Security Secret Server review

reviewer1953252
Head of IT Security at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
User-friendly, granular features, and is simple to implement, but the technical...
It requires customization, whereas out-of-the-box integrations do not. It takes a lot of coding and customization to integrate with so many different systems. It is not a networking device, it does not support the full proxy features for all PAM, or Privilege Access Management, access for any target systems. Other vendors have a full proxy...
Symantec Privileged Access Manager review

Balamurali P
Balamurali P
Solution Architect at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees
The DB clustering is a really good benefit of this solution.
An improvement for this solution is that it should not be constantly based on user name and password. There should be a condition to edit and update your username. Also, it would be nice to have a single sign-on, but that particular portal doesn't allow any copy/paste. In addition, I have an additional suggestion. I will give you a...

Since 2012, we've had 765,234 professionals use our research.

As seen in