User Reviews of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise & Telerik Test Studio
Updated March 2024
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Telerik Test Studio based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise review
VictorHorescu
Chief Executive Officer at iqst
Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a...
It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems....
Telerik Test Studio review
Chirag N M
Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Supports multiple platforms and identifies elements in a good way
Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code would be reusable. You won't have to change your test cases much. We wrote our code in a separate IDE, which was Visual Studio, and...
Since 2012, we've had 767,847 professionals use our research.
As seen in