User Reviews of IBM WebSphere Message Broker & Mule ESB

Updated March 2024

Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.

Download our FREE report comparing IBM WebSphere Message Broker and Mule ESB based on reviews, features, and more!

Where should we email your report?






IBM WebSphere Message Broker review

Akash Dalebehera
Akash Dalebehera
Technical Specialist at BT - British Telecom
Facilitates communication with legacy systems well, seamless, and highly effective
Taking into account the technical aspect of IBM WebSphere Message Broker as a stand-alone solution, it has proven to be extremely stable and of high quality. However, in comparison to its industry competitors, such as MuleSoft or other ESB solutions, the issue with IBM is that they frequently release new versions of the solution, resulting...
Mule ESB review

Archana Bhat
Archana Bhat
Senior Associate at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Provides good stability in cloud environment and efficient integration with...
One area that could be improved is the way that policies are propagated when APIs are moved from one environment to another. It's an issue, but when you develop and test the rest APIs in a lower environment and need to move them, there's a propagation process. This process moves certain aspects of the APIs, like the basic features. But when...

Since 2012, we've had 768,578 professionals use our research.

As seen in