User Reviews of IBM WebSphere Message Broker & Magic xpa Application Platform
Updated March 2024
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing IBM WebSphere Message Broker and Magic xpa Application Platform based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
IBM WebSphere Message Broker review
Akash Dalebehera
Technical Specialist at BT - British Telecom
Facilitates communication with legacy systems well, seamless, and highly effective
Taking into account the technical aspect of IBM WebSphere Message Broker as a stand-alone solution, it has proven to be extremely stable and of high quality. However, in comparison to its industry competitors, such as MuleSoft or other ESB solutions, the issue with IBM is that they frequently release new versions of the solution, resulting...
Magic xpa Application Platform review
IgorLastric
Chief Executive Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Fast development and user-oriented functionalities, but it needs better .NET...
First, in my personal opinion, being a developer myself and working with web and mobile technologies, I think they're trying to cover all the sectors, and that's the problem. They want to be one toolbox for everything, but primarily, we are using xpa to develop desktop applications, and in that area they're lacking functionalities,...
Since 2012, we've had 768,415 professionals use our research.
As seen in