User Reviews of NetApp NVMe AFF A800 & Pure FlashArray X NVMe
Updated March 2024
Would you like to learn about products from people using them now? Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you.
Download our FREE report comparing NetApp NVMe AFF A800 and Pure FlashArray X NVMe based on reviews, features, and more!
Where should we email your report?
NetApp NVMe AFF A800 review
Programmer Analyst at a university with 10,001+ employees
Very easy to manage, highly stable and offers robustness of the CLI, API, and GUI
Cost and speed are the biggest concerns. NetApp systems they're not slow, but they don't match the raw IOPs of some other parallel file systems design. The underlying architecture of the NetApp system isn't as conducive to pure raw speed, whether it's data I/O or metadata I/O, compared to some of their competitors. So that's a significant...
Pure FlashArray X NVMe review
Gokhan Dikmen
Vice President of product at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
A highly reliable solution that has run for over eight years without instability
I rate Pure FlashArray X NVMe a nine out of ten. Pure might be better than other products could be. But in some projects, IBM is better for the customer. However, I must understand what the customer needs. I am not saying that Pure is the best, but In some projects, I prefer to go with Dell, HP, or IBM. I need to understand the customer...
Since 2012, we've had 767,847 professionals use our research.
As seen in