commentBlock = $("#comment_post_29329").find('.comment-blocks'); commentBlock.find('.loading').hide(); commentBlock.find('.see-all-comments').hide(); commentBlock.html("
<\/a>
\"it_user635955<\/a>
it_user635955<\/a>Project Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees<\/span><\/div>
<\/span>Real User<\/span><\/div>
<\/i><\/div>
<\/i>Report as inappropriate<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Scored quite high when we evaluated it on compliance and compatibility with required ECM features (Gartner ECM assessment criteria used in our assessment), i.e. scored in the range of 92% to 96%. Among the criteria evaluated were library services, record services, content creation and capture, metadata management, workflow and BPM, navigation and search, security and access control, and architecture and integration functionalities.<\/p><\/div>

<\/i>Like<\/span>(0<\/span>)<\/a><\/i>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/a>
\"Toby<\/a>
Toby Ward<\/a>President at Prescient Digital Media<\/span><\/div>
<\/i>Top 5<\/span><\/span><\/i>Leaderboard<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span>Consultant<\/span><\/div>
<\/i><\/div>
<\/i>Report as inappropriate<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Yes, this is a typical approach and scenario for most companies. Most use it for document management, and team sites. However, more and more are using it for their enterprise intranet portal.<\/p><\/div>

<\/i>Like<\/span>(0<\/span>)<\/a><\/i>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/a>
\"Mario<\/a>
Mario Treviño Salazar<\/a>Solution Architect for New Products and Services at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees<\/span><\/div>
<\/i>Top 10<\/span><\/span><\/i>Leaderboard<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span>Real User<\/span><\/div>
<\/i><\/div>
<\/i>Report as inappropriate<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>

We use SharePoint mainly to store Microsoft Office documents.\n
We support some business process with this tool to cover the lack of functionallity of our current BPM, and also to do some simple Company workflows (request form, authorization forms, etc), mainly we cover the IT request forms with this tool.<\/p><\/div>

<\/i>Like<\/span>(0<\/span>)<\/a><\/i>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/a>
\"it_user329733<\/a>
it_user329733<\/a>Office 365 Consultant at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees<\/span><\/div>
<\/span>Vendor<\/span><\/div>
<\/i><\/div>
<\/i>Report as inappropriate<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>

There has been far more significant improvements in SharePoint online as opposed to the on-premises Sharepoint. With the release of the on-premises SharePoint 2016, though, the gap is a lot closer. But when it comes to availability and reliability, the on-premises is far more reliable because you don\'t worry too much about latency issues.<\/p><\/div>

<\/i>Like<\/span>(0<\/span>)<\/a><\/i>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/a>
\"it_user341562<\/a>
it_user341562<\/a>Owner & Corporate Trainer at a non-tech company<\/span><\/div>
<\/span>Vendor<\/span><\/div>
<\/i><\/div>
<\/i>Report as inappropriate<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>

The best thing about SharePoint is users are no longer frustrated by large documents being rejected. Finally there\'s a place that will accept them no matter the size. More people can read, edit and add comments while someone else is using it. And you don\'t have to be in the same city to do this. Nice! <\/p>\n\n

Retraining employees will take time but they\'ll learn how to use SharePoint once they see how to use it and the advantages it can have on their work.<\/p><\/div>

<\/i>Like<\/span>(0<\/span>)<\/a><\/i>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/a>
\"it_user143376<\/a>
it_user143376<\/a>Consultant with 201-500 employees<\/span><\/div>
<\/span>Vendor<\/span><\/div>
<\/i><\/div>
<\/i>Report as inappropriate<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>

http://blog.blksthl.com/2013/01/14/sharepoint-2013-feature-comparison-chart-all-editions/<\/p><\/div>

<\/i>Like<\/span>(0<\/span>)<\/a><\/i>Reply<\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/a>
\"it_user120555<\/a>
it_user120555<\/a>SharePoint Architecture and Develop at a consultancy with 51-200 employees<\/span><\/div>
<\/span>Consultant<\/span><\/div>
<\/i><\/div>
<\/i>Report as inappropriate<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Enterprise includes things like:<\/p>\n\n

Access Services;\n
Excel Services;\n
Visio Services;<\/p>\n\n

There are over 150 features that are in the Enterprise version (of which Foundation and Standard contain a subset). <\/p>\n\n

Are there specific business functions you are evaluating these versions/features against? It might help with the edition evaluation.<\/p><\/div>